Orth v. Warden, HDSP et al

Filing 33

ORDER - Respondents' motion to clarify (ECF No. 13 ) is therefore denied as moot. Respondents' motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 12 ) is granted nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/28/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

SEAN RODNEY ORTH,

10
11
12
13

Case No. 3:15-cv-00131-MMD-VPC
Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
WARDEN, HDSP, et al.,
Respondents.

14

This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Before

15

the Court are two motions. (ECF Nos. 13, 15.) In the motion to clarify, respondents

16

request that the Court direct petitioner to either provide a copy of the state court

17

judgment of conviction or the known state court case number which serves as the basis

18

of his petition. (ECF No. 13.) In his response, petitioner identified the case number for

19

the Nevada state court case. (ECF No. 14.) Respondents' motion to clarify (ECF No. 13)

20

is therefore denied as moot. Respondents also moved for an extension of time to serve

21

and file an answer to the petition. (ECF No. 12.) Good cause appearing, respondents'

22

motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 12) is granted nunc pro tunc.

23

DATED THIS 28th day of September 2016.

24
25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE