Orth v. Warden, HDSP et al

Filing 36

ORDER - Petitioner's motion to dismiss Ground 11 (ECF No. 35 ) is granted. Ground 11 of the petition in this action is dismissed without prejudice. Answer to all remaining claims due by 3/10/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/24/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 *** 7 8 9 SEAN RODNEY ORTH, Case No. 3:15-cv-00131-MMD-VPC Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN HDSP, et al., 10 Respondents. 11 12 On December 12, 2017, the Court concluded that Ground 11 of the habeas petition 13 in this case was unexhausted and directed petitioner to select one of three options with 14 respect to the unexhausted claim. (ECF No. 34.) On January 8, 2018, petitioner moved 15 to dismiss Ground 11 and proceed on his exhausted claims. (ECF No. 35.) No opposition 16 to the motion has been filed, and the time for doing so has expired. 17 18 Accordingly, it is therefore ordered that Ground 11 of the petition in this action is dismissed without prejudice. 19 It is further ordered that respondents shall file an answer to all remaining claims in 20 the amended petition (ECF No. 15) within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order. 21 The answer must include substantive arguments on the merits as to each remaining 22 ground in the petition, as well as any procedural defenses which may be applicable. In 23 filing the amended answer, respondents must comply with the requirements of Rule 5 of 24 the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts. 25 DATED THIS 24th day of January 2018. 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?