Hendrix v. State of Nevada et al
ORDER DENYING ECF No. 82 Motion for Subpoena. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 6/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JAMAL DAMON HENDRIX,
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
MINUTES OF THE COURT
June 7, 2017
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Subpoena on Defendant Pinkham (ECF No. 82).
Defendants have opposed the motion (ECF No. 88).
Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 82) is predicated on the fact that the summons and complaint
were served on Defendant Pinkham on November 18, 2016 (ECF No. 45), and Defendant Pinkham
has failed to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s complaint. The issuance of a subpoena would
not cure the Defendant’s apparent failure to respond to the complaint.
Plaintiff is advised that, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a), the proper procedure is to
file a motion for default.
Therefore, Plaintiff’s Motion for Subpoena on Defendant Pinkham (ECF No. 82) is
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?