Shropshire v. Baca et al

Filing 33

ORDER - The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 30 ) is ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22 ) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/22/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 WILLIAM SHROPSHIRE, 5 CASE NO.: 3:15-CV-00164-RCJ-WGC Plaintiff, ORDER 6 v. 7 V. FAJOTA, et al., 8 Defendants. _______________________________________ 9 10 Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge (ECF #301) 11 entered on August 18, 2016, recommending that the Court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary 12 Judgment (ECF #22). Plaintiff filed Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation 13 (ECF #31) and Defendants filed an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Objections (ECF #32). 14 The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of 15 the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant 16 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s 17 Report and Recommendation (#30) entered on August 18, 2016, should be ADOPTED AND 18 ACCEPTED. 19 20 21 22 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF #22) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of September, 2016. 24 25 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES 26 27 28 1 Refers to court’s docket number.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?