Keppel Properties, LLC v. Resurgam Equity Investments, LLC

Filing 43

ORDER denying ECF No. 41 Plaintiff's Renewed Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 11/07/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 KEPPEL PROPERTIES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ) RESURGAM EQUITY INVESTMENTS, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) ) _________________________________ ) 3:15-cv-00165-HDM-VPC ORDER 16 Before the court is plaintiff’s renewed motion for attorneys’ 17 fees (ECF No. 41), and defendant’s opposition (ECF No. 42). 18 Plaintiff did not file a reply. 19 On November 15, 2016, plaintiff filed a motion for contempt 20 (ECF No. 12) and a motion for attorneys’ fees (ECF No. 13). On May 21 24, 2017, this court issued a preliminary order of contempt and 22 made a preliminary finding that because the award was compensatory 23 in nature, it was not subject to attorneys’ fees and costs at that 24 time. (See ECF No. 38.) On August 23, 2017, the court held a 25 final hearing on the motions for contempt and for attorneys’ fees. 26 The court converted the preliminary order of contempt to a final 27 order and denied plaintiff’s original motion for attorneys’ fees. 28 1 1 (See ECF No. 40.) 2 granted plaintiff leave to file a renewed motion for attorney’s 3 fees, which is now before this court. 4 However, at the request of plaintiff, the court Having reviewed plaintiff’s renewed motion for attorneys’ fees 5 (ECF No. 41), the court finds that the motion does not contain any 6 additional facts or legal analysis that the court did not 7 previously consider when denying the prior motion for attorneys’ 8 fees. 9 10 Accordingly, plaintiff’s renewed motion for attorneys’ fees (ECF No. 41) is DENIED. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 DATED: This 7th day of November, 2017. 13 14 ____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?