Voss v. Baca et al
ORDERED that petitioner's motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 32 ) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
STEVEN FLOYD VOSS,
Case No. 3:15-cv-00183-HDM-VPC
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
Before the court are petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 32), respondents’
opposition (ECF No. 33), and petitioner’s reply (ECF No. 34). The court agrees with respondents.
Petitioner is trying to re-litigate issues that the court already has decided, and a motion for relief
from the judgment is not the proper method for that.
Reasonable jurists would not find the court’s conclusion to be debatable or wrong, and the
court will not issue a certificate of appealability.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for relief from judgment (ECF No.
32) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.
DATED: August 30, 2017.
HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?