Docena v. Navy Federal Credit Union

Filing 35

ORDER granting 34 Motion for Judgment subject to limitation. In the event plaintiff concludes that amendment of his complaint can cure a substantive deficiency upon which the court's order of dismissal was based, plainti ff shall have twenty (20) days from the entry of this order to amend his complaint. If an amended complaint is filed, defendant shall respond accordingly. If an amended complaint is not filed, the Clerk of Court shall enter the judgment of dismissal of this action. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/22/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 *** 8 9 10 GERARDO DOCENA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 3:15-CV-00184-LRH-WGC Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 13 14 NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, a Virginia Corporation, Defendant. 15 16 Before the court is defendant Navy Federal Credit Union’s (“Navy Federal”) Rule 58(d) 17 Request to Enter Separate Document Judgment (ECF No. 34). No opposition has been filed, 18 Navy Federal’s request followed the court’s order (ECF No. 33) granting Navy Federal’s Motion 19 to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 20 and the court will treat Navy Federal’s Request as a motion. 21 Rule 58 generally provides that “[e]very judgment and amended judgment must be set 22 forth on a separate document ....” Rule 58 is a “mechanical rule” that must be “mechanically 23 applied” to avoid uncertainties as to the date a judgment is entered. United States v. Indrelunas, 24 411 U.S. 216, 222, 93 S.Ct. 1562, 36 L.Ed.2d 202 (1973), disavowed in part on other grounds, 25 Bankers Trust Co. v. Mallis, 435 U.S. 381, 386 n. 7, 98 S.Ct. 1117, 55 L.Ed.2d 357 (1978) (per 26 curiam). A “judgment,” as used in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, is defined by Rule 54(a) 27 to include “a decree and any order from which an appeal lies.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(a). Under 28 28 U.S.C. § 1291, a judgment is final and appealable if the decision “ends the litigation on the 1 1 merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment.” Gulfstream Aerospace 2 Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 275, 108 S.Ct. 1133, 99 L.Ed.2d 296 (1988) (quoting 3 Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233, 65 S.Ct. 631, 89 L.Ed. 911 (1945)). 4 5 6 Good cause appearing, Navy Federal’s Motion to Enter Separate Document Judgment (ECF No. 34) is GRANTED subject to the following limitation: In the event plaintiff concludes that amendment of his complaint can cure a substantive 7 deficiency upon which the court’s order of dismissal was based, plaintiff shall have twenty (20) 8 days from the entry of this order to amend his complaint. If an amended complaint is filed, 9 defendant shall respond accordingly. If an amended complaint is not filed, the Clerk of Court 10 shall enter the judgment of dismissal of this action. 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 DATED this 22nd day of March, 2016. 13 LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?