Campbell v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 50

ORDER adopting and accepting Report and Recommendations ECF No 43 ; Defendants Jacob Park's Motion to Dismiss/Motion for Summary Judgment ECF No. 17 is granted; Defendants Green, Fletcher, Pinkham and Scott are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Clerk directed to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 01/04/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 DAVEYON CAMPBELL, 5 Plaintiff, 6 7 vs. 8 JAMES G. COX, et al., 9 Defendant. 10 ) Case No.: 3:15-CV-00194-RCJ-WGC ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 11 12 The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States 13 Magistrate (ECF #43) entered on October 21, 2016, in which the Magistrate Judge 14 recommends the Court grant Defendant Jacob Parr’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 17). 15 The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other 16 17 relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in accordance with 18 the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause 19 appearing, the court hereby 20 ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States 21 22 Magistrate Judge (ECF #43). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Jacob Parr’s Motion to 23 24 Dismiss/Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) is GRANTED. 25 26 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants Green, Fletcher, Pinkham and Scott are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 27 28 4(m). ORDER - 1 1 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED this 4th day of January, 2017. 5 6 7 _____________________________ ROBERT C. JONES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?