Campbell v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
63
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (ECF Nos. 60 , 62 ). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Deeds Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 48 ) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 53 ) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
DAVEYON CAMPBELL,
5
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
JAMES G. COX, et al.,
8
Defendants.
9
* **
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 3:15-CV-00194-RCJ-WGC
ORDER
10
The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
11
(ECF No. 60) entered on May 22, 2017, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends the Court grant
12
Deeds’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 48). And, the Report and Recommendation of the
13
United States Magistrate (ECF No. 62) entered on May 22, 2017, in which the Magistrate Judge
14
recommends the Court grant Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 53). The Court
15
has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record and
16
has made a review and determination in accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and
17
applicable case law, and good cause appearing, the court hereby
18
ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States
19
Magistrate Judge (ECF Nos. 60, 62).
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Deeds’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 48) is
21
GRANTED.
22
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No.
23
53) is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case.
24
July, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of June, 2017.
25
26
_______________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?