Hicks v. Baker et al

Filing 34

ORDER re 33 Letter for Status : The motion to stay (ECF No. 29 ) does not fall within the category that requires expedited disposition and will therefore be decided in the order of pending matters in civil cases. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

BRANDON M. HICKS,

Case No. 3:15-cv-00215-MMD-WGC
Petitioner,

10
v.

ORDER

11
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s letter (ECF No. 33), seeking a status check as to the

15

disposition of the pending motion to stay pursuant to Local Rule IA 7-1(a). The Court

16

disposes of pending matters in chronological order, except for those motions that require

17

disposition on an expedited basis. The Court is working on motions and matters

18

submitted before February 28, 2017, and will be moving through them chronologically.

19

The motion to stay (ECF No. 29) does not fall within the category that requires expedited

20

disposition and will therefore be decided in the order of pending matters in civil cases.

21

DATED THIS 13th day of July 2017.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE