Hicks v. Baker et al
ORDER re 33 Letter for Status : The motion to stay (ECF No. 29 ) does not fall within the category that requires expedited disposition and will therefore be decided in the order of pending matters in civil cases. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/13/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
BRANDON M. HICKS,
Case No. 3:15-cv-00215-MMD-WGC
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s letter (ECF No. 33), seeking a status check as to the
disposition of the pending motion to stay pursuant to Local Rule IA 7-1(a). The Court
disposes of pending matters in chronological order, except for those motions that require
disposition on an expedited basis. The Court is working on motions and matters
submitted before February 28, 2017, and will be moving through them chronologically.
The motion to stay (ECF No. 29) does not fall within the category that requires expedited
disposition and will therefore be decided in the order of pending matters in civil cases.
DATED THIS 13th day of July 2017.
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?