Smith v. Colvin

Filing 19

ORDER adopting and accepting 18 Report and Recommendation; denying 9 Motion for Remand and/or Reversal; and granting 12 Cross-Motion to Affirm. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 3/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 *** Case No. 3:15-cv-00218-LRH-(VPC) Plaintiff, ORDER SHELLY J. SMITH, 10 v. 11 12 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Before this Court is the Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge 16 Valerie P. Cooke (ECF No. 18) entered on February 18, 2016, recommending denying 17 Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand and/or Reversal (ECF No. 9) entered on August 20, 2015, 18 and granting Defendant’s Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF No. 12) entered on October 14, 19 2015. No objection to the Report and Recommendation has been filed. The action was 20 referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 21 1B 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of 22 Nevada. 23 The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the 24 pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant 25 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the 26 Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 18) entered on February 18, 27 2016, should be adopted and accepted. 28 /// 1 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 2 Recommendation (ECF No. 18) entered on February 18, 2016, is adopted and 3 accepted, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand and/or Reversal (ECF No. 9) is DENIED. 4 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant’s Cross-Motion to Affirm (ECF No. 12) is GRANTED. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 DATED this 11th day of March, 2016. 8 9 LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?