Gebhart v. McHugh
Filing
10
ORDER re attached letter sent to Court : Ex parte communications with a judge are inappropriate. Letters to a judge will be disregarded. The Court will not take any action in response to the letter. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/8/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
RICHARD GEBHART,
10
Case No. 3:15-cv-00221-MMD-VPC
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
11
12
JOHN McHUGH, SECRETARY OF THE
ARMY,
13
Defendant.
14
15
Plaintiff sent a copy of the attached letter to the Court. Plaintiff is admonished
16
that ex parte communications with a judge are inappropriate in most circumstances.
17
See Local Rules, Part II, LR 7-6. Moreover, a document requesting a Court order must
18
be styled as a motion, not a letter (see F.R.C.P. 7). Letters to a judge will be
19
disregarded. To the extent Plaintiff wishes to ask for an extension of time to file his
20
response to the motion to dismiss, Plaintiff should reach out to the defendant’s counsel
21
to secure a stipulation for extension of time first before filing a motion requesting an
22
extension. The Court will not take any action in response to the letter.
23
DATED THIS 8th day of February 2016.
24
25
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?