Draw v. Baca et al
ORDER granting ECF No. 37 Motion to Extend Time : Answer to petition due by 4/3/2017. Reply due 90 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
HUBERT W. DRAW, JR.,
Case No. 3:15-cv-00224-MMD-WGC
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
In this habeas corpus action, the respondents were due, on March 20, 2017, to file
an answer, responding to the remaining claims in Hubert W. Draw, Jr.’s petition for writ
of habeas corpus. (See Order entered December 20, 2016 (ECF No. 36).)
On March 20, 2017, respondents filed a motion for an extension of time (ECF No.
37), requesting a 14-day extension of time, to April 3, 2017. This would be the first
extension of this deadline. Respondents’ counsel states that the extension of time is
necessary because of her obligations in another case. The Court finds that respondents’
motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay,
and that there is good cause for the extension of time requested.
It is therefore ordered that respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No.
37) is granted. Respondents will have until April 3, 2017, to file their answer. Thereafter,
Draw will have ninety (90) days to file a reply.
DATED THIS 20th day of March 2017.
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?