Draw v. Baca et al

Filing 38

ORDER granting ECF No. 37 Motion to Extend Time : Answer to petition due by 4/3/2017. Reply due 90 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 *** 8 9 10 11 12 HUBERT W. DRAW, JR., Case No. 3:15-cv-00224-MMD-WGC Petitioner, ORDER v. ISIDRO BACA, et al., Respondents. 13 In this habeas corpus action, the respondents were due, on March 20, 2017, to file 14 an answer, responding to the remaining claims in Hubert W. Draw, Jr.’s petition for writ 15 of habeas corpus. (See Order entered December 20, 2016 (ECF No. 36).) 16 On March 20, 2017, respondents filed a motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 17 37), requesting a 14-day extension of time, to April 3, 2017. This would be the first 18 extension of this deadline. Respondents’ counsel states that the extension of time is 19 necessary because of her obligations in another case. The Court finds that respondents’ 20 motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, 21 and that there is good cause for the extension of time requested. 22 It is therefore ordered that respondents’ Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 23 37) is granted. Respondents will have until April 3, 2017, to file their answer. Thereafter, 24 Draw will have ninety (90) days to file a reply. 25 DATED THIS 20th day of March 2017. 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?