Scott v. Baker et al
Filing
27
ORDERED that petitioner's motion for production of documents (ECF No. 21 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
JOE NATHAN SCOTT, JR.,
Case No. 3:15-cv-00231-RCJ-VPC
10
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
11
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14
On August 23, 2016, this court dismissed petitioner Joe Nathan Scott, Jr.’s pro se
15
petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 as time barred (ECF No. 19).
16
Judgment was entered (ECF No. 20). Thereafter, Scott filed a motion for request of
17
production of documents with this court (ECF No. 21), and he filed a notice of appeal with
18
the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (ECF No. 22). On January 27, 2017, the Ninth Circuit
19
Court of Appeals denied a certificate of appealability (ECF No. 26). In the motion for
20
production of documents, Scott states that he needed respondents to provide copies of
21
certain filings in order to proceed with his appeal. The case is closed, and this court lacks
22
jurisdiction to consider the motion. Moreover, the motion would be moot because the
23
Ninth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability.
24
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for production of
25
documents (ECF No. 21) is DENIED.
26
DATED: 12 June 2017.
27
ROBERT C. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?