Scott v. Baker et al
ORDERED that petitioner's motion for production of documents (ECF No. 21 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JOE NATHAN SCOTT, JR.,
Case No. 3:15-cv-00231-RCJ-VPC
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
On August 23, 2016, this court dismissed petitioner Joe Nathan Scott, Jr.’s pro se
petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 as time barred (ECF No. 19).
Judgment was entered (ECF No. 20). Thereafter, Scott filed a motion for request of
production of documents with this court (ECF No. 21), and he filed a notice of appeal with
the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (ECF No. 22). On January 27, 2017, the Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals denied a certificate of appealability (ECF No. 26). In the motion for
production of documents, Scott states that he needed respondents to provide copies of
certain filings in order to proceed with his appeal. The case is closed, and this court lacks
jurisdiction to consider the motion. Moreover, the motion would be moot because the
Ninth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner’s motion for production of
documents (ECF No. 21) is DENIED.
DATED: 12 June 2017.
ROBERT C. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?