Cottle v. Cox et al
Filing
18
ORDER IFP status shall not continue on appeal. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/7/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; copy sent to USCA 9th Circuit via NEF - JC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
______________________________________
)
)
SEAN D. COTTLE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JAMES COX et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
3:15-cv-00237-RCJ-WGC
ORDER
12
13
Plaintiff James Cox is a prisoner in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections
14
(“NDOC”). He sued Renown Regional Medical Center (“Renown”) and five individual
15
Defendants in this Court for violations of his Eighth Amendment rights under § 1983 based on
16
alleged improper treatment of his HIV. Plaintiff listed six counts, each of them for violations of
17
the Eighth Amendment, inadequate medical care, negligence, and breach of contract. The
18
gravamen of the Complaint was that NDOC treats Plaintiff’s HIV in part through telemedicine
19
from Renown, and Plaintiff argued that constituted cruel and unusual punishment, medical
20
malpractice, and a breach of contract.
21
The Court dismissed the federal claim, finding that it essentially alleged medical
22
malpractice, and declined supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims for, inter alia,
23
medical malpractice. Plaintiff has appealed, and the Court of Appeals has referred the case to the
24
Court to determine whether in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal.
1 of 2
1
The Court finds that in forma pauperis status should not continue on appeal, as the appeal
2
is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). The claim sounds in medical malpractice, not cruel and
3
unusual punishment. “[A] complaint that a physician has been negligent in diagnosing or
4
treating a medical condition does not state a valid claim of medical mistreatment under the
5
Eighth Amendment. It does not become a constitutional violation merely because the victim is a
6
prisoner.” Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 106 (1976).
CONCLUSION
7
8
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that in forma pauperis status shall not continue on appeal.
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
Dated this 7th day of January, 2015.
Dated this 15th day of December, 2016.
11
12
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?