Johnson v. LeGrand et al

Filing 7

ORDER directing Petitioner, within 20 days, to either (1) submit proof that he has obtained leave of the Court of Appeals to present this successive petition, or (2) file a notice of voluntary dismissal; directing Clerk to send Petitioner a copy of the docket sheet (mailed 12/30/2015). Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 12/30/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 TIMOTHY HOWARD JOHNSON, 11 Petitioner, 12 vs. 13 ROBERT LeGRAND, et al., 14 Case No. 3:15-cv-00258-HDM-WGC Respondents. ORDER 15 16 This action is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 17 by a Nevada state prisoner. 18 By order filed December 15, 2015, the Court informed petitioner that the petition is subject 19 to dismissal as successive for failure to comply with 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b). Section 2244(b) requires 20 that a petitioner seeking to file a “second or successive” habeas petition must first obtain 21 authorization from the federal Court of Appeals to do so. This Court’s order of December 15, 2015, 22 granted petitioner thirty days to submit any proof he might have to demonstrate that he obtained 23 leave of the Court of Appeals to present this successive petition. The order specified that if 24 petitioner is unable to demonstrate that he obtained permission of the Court of Appeals, the Court 25 will enter an order dismissing the successive petition. (ECF No. 5). 26 On December 28, 2015, petitioner filed a letter with the Court seeking the identity of the 27 person who submitted the instant habeas petition to this Court. (ECF No. 6). Petitioner is informed 28 1 that the petition in this action was submitted by Timothy H. Johnson, inmate #23766, at Lovelock 2 Correctional Center. (ECF No. 1-1, at p. 1). The petition is signed by Timothy H. Johnson. (ECF 3 No. 1-2, at p. 1). If petitioner wishes to withdraw his petition, he may do so by filing a notice of 4 voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If petitioner 5 wishes to proceed with this action, he must submit any proof he might have to demonstrate that he 6 has obtained leave of the Court of Appeals to present this successive petition. The Court will grant 7 petitioner additional time in which to do so, as set forth below. 8 9 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within twenty (20) days of the date of entry of this order, petitioner SHALL SUBMIT any proof he might have to demonstrate that he has obtained 10 leave of the Court of Appeals to present this successive petition. If petitioner is unable to 11 demonstrate that he has obtained permission of the Court of Appeals, the Court will enter an order 12 dismissing the successive petition. 13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if petitioner does not wish to proceed with this action, 14 he shall file a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil 15 Procedure within twenty (20) days of the date of entry of this order. 16 17 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall send petitioner a copy of the CM/ECF docket printout for this case. Dated this 30th day of December, 2015. 19 20 21 HOWARD D. McKIBBEN UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?