Chemeon Surface Technology, LLC vs Metalast International, Inc, et al
Filing
617
ORDER GRANTING in part and DENYING part the stipulation for extension of time (ECF No. 616 ). The parties shall file their closing arguments and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law no later than 9:00 am on Monday, December 14, 2020. No further extensions of time shall be granted for any reason. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 12/9/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Case 3:15-cv-00294-CLB Document 617 Filed 12/09/20 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
CHEMEON SURFACE
TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
8
9
10
11
12
Case No. 3:15-CV-0294-CLB
v.
METALAST INTERNATIONAL,
INC., et al.
Defendants.
____________________________/
13
At the conclusion of the trial in this case on November 17, 2020, the parties agreed
14
to file written closing arguments and proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law on
15
December 11, 2020 (ECF No. 608). Three weeks later and only three days prior to the
16
due date, the parties have stipulated to an extension of time because “counsel for plaintiff”
17
have experienced illness and unexpected deadlines in other cases (ECF No. 616). The
18
court notes that plaintiff currently has a minimum of three trial counsel and one associate
19
that appeared at trial in this case. Therefore, the court GRANTS in part and DENIES in
20
part the stipulation for extension of time (ECF No. 616).
21
The parties shall file their closing arguments and proposed findings of fact and
22
conclusions of law no later than 9:00 am on Monday, December 14, 2020. No further
23
extensions of time shall be granted for any reason.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
December 9, 2020
DATED: _____________________
26
27
28
____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?