Chemeon Surface Technology, LLC vs Metalast International, Inc, et al

Filing 72

ORDER granting 71 Stipulation and Order to Participate in a Further Mediation and/or Settlement Conference before the Honorable Judge Greg(sic) Zive. Pursuant to the stipulation of counsel, it is ordered that a settlement conference/mediation conference in this matter and its related Bankruptcy matter be set before the Honorable Gregg Zive, US Bankruptcy Judge. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/23/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF and emailed to David_Lindersmith@nvb.uscourts.gov - PAV)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 5441 Kietzke Lane, 2nd Floor Reno, NV 89511 Phone: (775) 327-3000 ♦ Fax: (775) 786-6179 HOLLAND & HART LLP 10 11 12 Robert C. Ryan (#7164) Anthony Hall (#5977) Tamara Reid (#9840) HOLLAND & HART LLP 5441 Kietzke Lane, Second Floor Reno, Nevada 89511 Phone: (775) 327-3042 Fax: (775) 786-6179 rcryan@hollandhart.com ahall@hollandhart.com treid@hollandhart.com Christopher B. Hadley (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) HOLLAND & HART LLP 222 South Main St., Suite 2200 Salt Lake City, UT 84101 Phone: (801) 799-5873 Fax: (801) 618-4238 cbhadley@hollandhart.com Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter Defendants 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 CHEMEON SURFACE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, 16 Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 METALAST INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Nevada 19 corporation; METALAST, INC., a Nevada corporation; SIERRA DORADO, INC., a Nevada 20 corporation; DAVID M. SEMAS, an individual; GREG D. SEMAS, an individual; and WENDI 21 SEMAS-FAURIA, an individual. 22 Defendants. 23 DAVID M. SEMAS; and METALAST INTERNATIONAL, INC., 24 Counterclaimants, 25 v. 26 CHEMEON SURFACE TECHNOLOGY, LLC, DEAN S. MEILING; and MADYLON 27 MEILING, 28 Counter Defendants. 1 Case No.: 3:15-cv-00294-MMD-VPC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN A FURTHER MEDIATION AND/OR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE THE HONORABLE JUDGE GREG ZIVE 1 The parties by and through undersigned counsel and in consultation with the Court’s 2 Administrator, stipulate as follows: 3 RECITALS 4 1. On October 20, 2015, the Court held a motion hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion for 5 Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 12) and Defendant’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 6 52). Both motions were denied without prejudice as to the trademark claims. 7 2. At the October 20, 2015 hearing, Judge Du suggested that another settlement 8 conference could be conducted with the Honorable Gregg W. Zive presiding. 5441 Kietzke Lane, 2nd Floor Reno, NV 89511 Phone: (775) 327-3000 ♦ Fax: (775) 786-6179 STIPULATION 10 HOLLAND & HART LLP 9 The parties hereby stipulate and inform the Court that they consent to participate in a 11 further mediation and/or settlement conference before Judge Zive if ordered by the Court. The 12 parties further agree to schedule this conference in consultation with the Courtroom 13 Administrator. 14 15 Neither the request for, nor the entering into, this Stipulation shall constitute, or be urged by any party as, an admission against interest. 16 17 DATED this 22nd day of October, 2015. 18 HOLLAND & HART LLP 19 /s/ Robert C. Ryan Robert C. Ryan (7164) Anthony Hall (5977) Tamara Reid (9840) 5441 Kietzke Lane, Second Floor Reno, Nevada 89511 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Christopher B. Hadley (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) HOLLAND & HART LLP 222 South Main St., Suite 2200 Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter Defendants 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 DATED this 22nd day of October, 2015. 2 HOY CHRISSINGER KIMMEL VALLAS, PC 3 5 /s/ Michael D. Hoy__ Michael D. Hoy (#2723) 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 840 Reno, Nevada 89501 (775) 786-8000 6 Attorneys for Defendants 4 ____ 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED: 9 5441 Kietzke Lane, 2nd Floor Reno, NV 89511 Phone: (775) 327-3000 ♦ Fax: (775) 786-6179 HOLLAND & HART LLP 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 23 DATED OCTOBER __, 2015 11 12 8168847_1 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?