Wallace v. Veterans Affairs

Filing 6

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION that the District Court enter an order DISMISSING this action without prejudice. ( Objections to R&R due by 11/26/2015. ) Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 11/9/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 3:15-cv-00302-RCJ-VPC JOHN WILLIAM WALLACE, 5 Plaintiff, 6 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE v. 7 8 VETERANS AFFAIRS, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 This report and recommendation is made to the Honorable Robert C. Jones, United States 12 District Judge. The action was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 13 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and the Local Rules of Practice, LR IB 1-4. 14 15 On June 8, 2015, plaintiff submitted a four-page list of various words, company names, landmarks, countries, groups of people and addresses (#1). 16 On July 22, 2015, the court ordered plaintiff to submit an application to proceed in forma 17 pauperis and a properly styled complaint on or before August 14, 2015 (#3). Plaintiff was 18 cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation to the District Court to dismiss 19 this action. Id. Since that time, plaintiff has filed two more documents that merely list repetitive 20 words (#s 4 & 5); however, he has not filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis or a 21 complaint as directed.1 22 23 Based upon the foregoing, the undersigned magistrate judge recommends that this action be dismissed without prejudice. 24 25 26 27 28 1 The court notes that plaintiff has had multiple similar actions dismissed in this District. See case nos. 3:11-CV-0278-RCJ (VPC); 3:11-CV-0808-RCJ (VPC); 3:13-CV-0174-RCJ (WGC); 3:12CV-0223-LRH (VPC); 3:12-CV-0362-LRH (VPC); and 3:15-CV-0161-MMD (VPC). 1 The parties should be aware of the following: 2 1. They may file, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Rule IB 3-2 of the Local 3 Rules of Practice, specific written objections to this Report and Recommendation within fourteen 4 (14) days of receipt. These objections should be titled “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report 5 and Recommendation” and should be accompanied by points and authorities for consideration by 6 the District Court. 7 2. This Report and Recommendation is not an appealable order, and any notice of 8 appeal pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1), Fed. R. App. P., should not be filed until entry of the District 9 Court’s judgment. 10 RECOMMENDATION 11 For the reason stated above, the undersigned Magistrate Judge recommends that the 12 13 District Court enter an order DISMISSING this action without prejudice. DATED: November 9, 2015. 14 15 ________________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?