Hissung v. Aranas et al

Filing 40

ORDER denying Plaintiff's ECF No. 38 Motion to Correct Error. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/16/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ROMEO ARANAS et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) ___________________________________ ) 13 I. 7 8 9 10 11 MICHAEL DAVID HISSUNG, 3:15-cv-00304-RCJ-WGC ORDER DISCUSSION 14 On September 22, 2016, this Court adopted the report and recommendation of the U.S. 15 Magistrate Judge and granted Defendants’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement. (ECF 16 No. 32). In light of the settlement agreement, the Court denied Plaintiff’s application to 17 proceed in forma pauperis as moot. (ECF No. 36). 18 Plaintiff now files a motion for the Court to correct its error in denying Plaintiff’s 19 application to proceed in forma pauperis as moot. (ECF No. 38). The Court denies this 20 motion to correct. In a previous order, the Court explained that a decision on the application 21 to proceed in forma pauperis was deferred in order to give the parties an opportunity to settle 22 their dispute before the $350 filing fee was paid. (ECF No. 6 at 2). The Court explained that 23 if Plaintiff did not settle his case during the stay, the Court would process the application to 24 proceed in forma pauperis and Plaintiff would be required to pay the full $350 filing fee. (Id. 25 at 3). In this case, Plaintiff and Defendants settled their case and, thus, the Court correctly 26 denied the application to proceed in forma pauperis as moot to prevent Plaintiff from paying 27 the $350 filing after settlement. 28 /// 1 2 3 4 5 II. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to correct error (ECF No. 38) is denied. Dated: This 16th day of February, 2017. DATED: This _____ day of January, 2017. 6 7 _________________________________ United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?