Hamilton v. Aranas et al
Filing
48
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 43 ). Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22 ) is GRANTED. Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) (Main Document 48 replaced on 1/4/2017 to effect service of correct image.) (DRM). Modified on 1/4/2017 to correct docket text and regenerate NEF (DRM).
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CCOURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
6
ROLAND P. HAMILTON,
7
8
Plaintiff,
vs.
9
10
ROMEO ARANAS, et al.,
Defendant.
11
) Case No.: 3:15-CV-00342-RCJ-WGC
)
) ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
12
13
14
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge (ECF No. 431) entered on November 22, 2016, recommending that the Court
15
16
grant Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 22). On December 7, 2016
17
Plaintiff filed Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.
18
46) and Defendant filed an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Objections (ECF No. 47) on
19
December 20, 2016.
20
21
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the
22
objections of the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other
23
relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2.
24
The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF
25
No. 43) entered on November 22, 2016, should be ADOPTED and ACCEPTED.
26
27
28
1
Refers to Court’s docket number.
ORDER - 1
1
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 22) is GRANTED.
3
4
5
6
7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment
accordingly and close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 4th day of January, 2017.
8
9
10
ROBERT C. JONES
Senior District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?