Hull v. Aranas et al
Filing
52
ORDER adopting and accepting ECF No. 48 R&R; granting Defendants' ECF No. 25 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying as moot Plaintiff's ECF no. 17 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; directing Clerk to enter judgment and close case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CCOURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
6
ROGER HULL,
7
8
Plaintiff,
vs.
9
10
ROMEO ARANAS, et al.,
Defendant.
11
) Case No.: 3:15-CV-00348-RCJ-VPC
)
) ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
12
13
14
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge (ECF No. 481) entered on November 4, 2016, recommending that the Court grant
15
16
Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 25) and deny as moot Plaintiff’s
17
Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF No. 17). On November 14, 2016 Plaintiff filed
18
Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 50) and
19
Defendants filed an Opposition to Plaintiff’s Objections (ECF No. 51) on December 1,
20
21
22
2016.
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the
23
objections of the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other
24
relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2.
25
The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF
26
27
28
No. 48) entered on November 4, 2016, should be ADOPTED and ACCEPTED.
1
Refers to Court’s docket number.
ORDER - 1
1
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 25) is GRANTED.
3
4
5
6
7
8
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (ECF
No. 17) is DENIED as MOOT.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment
accordingly and close the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
Dated this 4th day of January, 2017.
11
12
13
ROBERT C. JONES
Senior District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?