Olsen v. LeGrand et al
ORDER granting ECF No. 25 Motion to Extend Time. Petitioner's amended petition due by 1/16/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/07/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
CARL HENRY OLSEN, III,
Case No. 3:15-cv-00367-MMD-WGC
ROBERT LeGRAND, et al.,
This habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the Court on
petitioner’s third motion for an enlargement of time (ECF No. 25).
Petitioner Carl Olsen challenges his 1990 Nevada state conviction, pursuant to a
jury verdict, of eight counts of sexual assault on a minor under the age of fourteen. He
is serving eight consecutive sentences of life with the possibility of parole after a
minimum of ten years served on each sentence.
This matter was reversed and remanded following an incorrect dismissal of the
petition as a successive petition. On remand, the Court directed petitioner to file an
amended petition within thirty days on July 20, 2017. The Court thereafter has extended
the time for petitioner to respond twice, with the amended petition currently being due
on November 17, 2017. Petitioner now seeks a sixty-day extension to January 16, 2018.
The Court will grant petitioner this one last extension out of an abundance of
caution. With the current requested extension, petitioner will have had nearly six months
to file an amended petition. That is beyond, well beyond, ample time for a litigant,
including a pro se litigant, to prepare and file an amended petition.
Petitioner refers to meetings with other inmates concerning the pleading and
limitations on law library access. The original petition referenced prior claims purportedly
contained in other documents. Petitioner does not necessarily need to consult with
multiple inmates and conduct extensive legal research in order to prepare a pleading
presenting claims purportedly contained in prior documents. In all events, the nearly six
months allowed to do so by the extensions herein will be more than ample time. A
request for further extension of time will be considered based upon only the most
compelling of circumstances, and the circumstances presented on the present motion
do not constitute such circumstances.
It therefore is ordered that petitioner’s motion for an enlargement of time (ECF
No. 25) is granted. Petitioner will have until January 16, 2018, within which to mail an
amended petition to the Clerk for filing.
If an amended petition is not timely mailed for filing, this action will be dismissed
without further advance notice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted and for failure to comply with the orders of the Court.
DATED THIS 7th day of November 2017.
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?