Byars v. Williams et al

Filing 35

ORDER giving Petitioner until 8/31/2017 to respond to ECF No. 27 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 7/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 MICHAEL DWAYNE BYARS, 10 Petitioner, 3:15-cv-00388-RCJ-VPC 11 vs. 12 BRYAN WILLIAMS, SR., et al., ORDER 13 14 Respondents. _______________________________/ 15 16 In this habeas corpus action, brought pro se by Michael Dwayne Byars, the respondents filed 17 a motion to dismiss on May 17, 2017 (ECF No. 27), seeking dismissal of Ground 1 of Byars’ habeas 18 petition. Byars was due to respond to the motion to dismiss by July 17, 2017. See Order entered 19 February 16, 2017 (ECF No. 24) (60 days for response to motion to dismiss). Byars did not file a 20 response to the motion to dismiss by July 17, 2017. In light of the fact that Byars brings this action pro se, and noting that he filed a notice of 21 22 change of address on June 12, 2017 (ECF No. 34), the Court will, sua sponte, grant Byars a 45-day 23 extension of time to respond to the motion to dismiss. The Court will not be inclined to further 24 extend this deadline. 25 /// 26 /// 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that petitioner will have until August 31, 2017, to 2 respond to respondents’ motion to dismiss. In all other respects, the schedule for further proceedings 3 set forth in the order entered February 16, 2017 (ECF No. 24) shall remain in effect. 4 5 20th day ____________________________, 2017. Dated this _____day of July, 2017. 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?