Macias v. Baker et al
Filing
52
ORDER granting ECF No. 51 Motion to Extend Time; Respondent's answer to ECF No. 6 Macias's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus due by 4/22/2021. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/8/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SC)
Case 3:15-cv-00461-RCJ-CLB Document 52 Filed 03/08/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
FRANK MACIAS,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
14
vs.
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
Case No.: 3:15-cv-00461-RCJ-CLB
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR
ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE
ANSWER TO PETITION FOR WRIT OF
HABEAS CORPUS (ECF NO. 51)
Respondents.
15
16
Respondents move this Court for an enlargement of time of 45 days from the current due date of
17
March 8, 2021, up to and including April 22, 2021, in which to file their answer to Frank Macias’s Petition
18
for a Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (ECF No. 6). This Motion is made pursuant
19
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and Rule 6-1 of the Local Rules of Practice and is based upon the attached
20
declaration of counsel. This is the first enlargement of time sought by Respondents to file the response,
21
and the request is brought in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
22
23
24
25
26
DATED: March 3, 2021.
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
By: /s/ Trisha Chapman
Trisha Chapman (Bar. No. 12716)
Deputy Attorney General
27
28
Page 1 of 3
Case 3:15-cv-00461-RCJ-CLB Document 52 Filed 03/08/21 Page 2 of 2
DECLARATION OF TRISHA CHAPMAN
1
2
3
STATE OF NEVADA )
) ss:
COUNTY OF CLARK )
4
I, TRISHA CHAPMAN, being first duly sworn under oath, deposes and states as follows:
5
1.
I am an attorney licensed to practice law in all courts within the State of Nevada and am
6
employed as a Deputy Attorney General in the Office of the Nevada Attorney General. I have been
7
assigned to represent Respondents in Frank Macias v. Renee Baker, et al., Case No. 3:16-cv-00461-RCJ-
8
CLB, and as such, have personal knowledge of the matters contained herein.
9
2.
This Motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.
10
3.
The deadline to file the answer to Macias’s Petition is March 8, 2021.
11
4.
I have been unable with due diligence to timely complete the response herein. I recently
12
transferred to the Post-Conviction Division of the Attorney General’s Office on February 16, 2021. I am
13
in the process of onboarding, training and familiarizing myself with a new caseload. I need additional
14
time to review Macias’s appellate record so that I can properly address the merits of his claims and file
15
an answer to his petition as identified by this Court’s order issued on January 8, 2021. See ECF No. 44.
16
5.
Given that Macias is pro se, I have not conferred with the other side for this request.
17
6.
For the foregoing reasons, I respectfully request an enlargement of time of 45 days, up to
18
and including April 22, 2021, in which to file the answer to Macias’s Petition.
19
ORDER
20
21
22
23
24
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Extend Time (ECF No. 51) is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondents shall file an answer to Macias's Petition for
Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 6 ) on or before April 22, 2021.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 8th day of March, 2021.
25
26
27
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
28
Page 2 of 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?