Williams v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 5

ORDER granting 4 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal; denying as moot 1 IFP application; dismissing this action in its entirety without prejudice; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/25/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 *** 10 BRANDON C. WILLIAMS, 11 Case No. 3:15-cv-00481-MMD-VPC Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 STATE OF NEVADA et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 I. DISCUSSION 16 Plaintiff, a pro se prisoner, previously filed an application to proceed in forma 17 pauperis and submitted a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. (Dkt. no. 1, 1-1.) On 18 October 19, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking to voluntarily dismiss his case. (Dkt. 19 no. 4.) 20 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), a plaintiff may dismiss an 21 action without a court order by filing “a notice of dismissal before the opposing party 22 serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 41(a)(1)(A)(i). The Court grants Plaintiff’s motion to voluntarily dismiss this action 24 because no responsive pleading has been filed in this case. As such, the Court 25 dismisses this action without prejudice. 26 II. 27 28 CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, it is ordered that the motion for voluntary dismissal (dkt. no. 4) is granted. 1 2 It is further ordered that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (dkt. no. 1) is denied as moot. 3 It is further ordered that this action is dismissed in its entirety without prejudice. 4 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. 5 6 DATED THIS 25th day of November 2015. 7 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?