Bank of America, N.A., Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP et al v. Huffaker Hills Unit No. 2 Residence Association, et al

Filing 65

ORDER granting ECF No. 64 Stipulation to Extend re ECF No. 60 Motion for Summary Judgment (First Request): Nadina Beverly, Trustee for the Beverly-Blair Trust No. 7's response due by 11/21/2018. Reply due by 12/12/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 DAVID E. ADKINS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 4503 611 Sierra Rose Dr., Suite B Reno, Nevada 89511 Tel: (775) 636-6222 Fax: (775) 636-6912 Email: david@algnv.com Attorney for Beverly-Blair Trust No. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP FKA COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS SERVICING LP; FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a government sponsored enterprise; FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, as Conservator of Federal National Mortgage Association, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 v. Case No.: 3:15-CV-00502-MMD-WGC STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT NADINA BEVERLY, TRUSTEE FOR THE BEVERLYBLAIR TRUST NO. 7, TO OPPOSE PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO SET DEADLINE FOR REPLY BRIEFS. [First Request] HUFFAKER HILL UNIT NO. 2 RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION; NADINA BEVERLY, TRUSTEE FOR THE BEVERLY- BLAIR TRUST NO. 7, Defendants. ____________________________________/ IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants Bank of America 24 N.A. (“BANA”), Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and Federal Housing 25 Finance Agency (“FHFA”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), Defendant, Huffaker Hill Unit No. 2 26 27 28 Residence Association (the “Association”), and Defendant/Counterclaimant, Nadina Beverly, Trustee for the Beverly-Blair Trust No. 7 (“Beverly”), by and through the parties’ respective counsel, to extend the deadline for Beverly to oppose Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment -1- 1 2 3 filed on October 15, 2018 (“Motion” at Doc. No. 60) to November 21, 2018. Beverly’s opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion is currently due on November 5, 2018. Good cause exists to extend the deadline for the reason that, as the Court has already granted Plaintiffs’ 4 5 and Defendant Huffaker Hill Unit No. 2 Residence Association’s (“Association”) stipulation to 6 extend Association’s deadline to respond to the Motion until November 21, 2018, to allow 7 Beverly the same time to respond would allow Beverly’s counsel to coordinate his opposition 8 with Association’s, and for the added reason that Beverly’s counsel was absent from his office 9 for a portion of October, and requires additional time to more fully research his client’s 10 11 12 opposition. In consideration of the above extension, the parties further stipulate that Plaintiffs shall 13 have through December 12, 2018, in which to file their respective reply briefs to both 14 Association’s and to Beverly’s opposition briefs, in support of their Motion. 15 This is the Parties’ first request for an extension regarding Beverly’s opposition and to set 16 17 18 a deadline for the filing of any reply briefs and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party. 19 DATED this 1st day of November 2018. DATED this 2nd day of November 2018. 20 DAVID E. ADKINS, ESQ. AKERMAN, LLP /s/ David E. Adkins, Esq. DAVID E. ADKINS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 4503 611 Sierra Rose Drive, Suite B Reno, NV 89511 Tel: (775) 636-6222 Email: david@algnv.com Attorney for Nadina Blair, Trustee for Beverly-Blair Trust No. 7 /s/ Jared M. Sechrist, Esq. JARED M. SECHRIST, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10439 ARIEL STERN, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 8276 1160 Town Center Drive, Ste. 330 Las Vegas, NV 89144 Tel: (702) 634-5000 Email: jared.sechrist@akerman.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs Bank of America, N.A. & Federal National Mortgage Association 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?