Bank of America, N.A., Successor by Merger to BAC Home Loans Servicing LP f/k/a Countrywide Home Loans Servicing LP et al v. Huffaker Hills Unit No. 2 Residence Association, et al
Filing
65
ORDER granting ECF No. 64 Stipulation to Extend re ECF No. 60 Motion for Summary Judgment (First Request): Nadina Beverly, Trustee for the Beverly-Blair Trust No. 7's response due by 11/21/2018. Reply due by 12/12/2018. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 11/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DAVID E. ADKINS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 4503
611 Sierra Rose Dr., Suite B
Reno, Nevada 89511
Tel: (775) 636-6222
Fax: (775) 636-6912
Email: david@algnv.com
Attorney for Beverly-Blair Trust No. 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., SUCCESSOR BY
MERGER TO BAC HOME LOANS
SERVICING LP FKA COUNTRYWIDE
HOME LOANS SERVICING LP; FEDERAL
NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, a
government sponsored enterprise; FEDERAL
HOUSING
FINANCE
AGENCY,
as
Conservator of Federal National Mortgage
Association,
15
Plaintiffs,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
v.
Case No.: 3:15-CV-00502-MMD-WGC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND DEADLINE FOR
DEFENDANT NADINA BEVERLY,
TRUSTEE FOR THE BEVERLYBLAIR TRUST NO. 7, TO OPPOSE
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO
SET DEADLINE FOR REPLY
BRIEFS.
[First Request]
HUFFAKER HILL UNIT NO. 2 RESIDENCE
ASSOCIATION;
NADINA
BEVERLY,
TRUSTEE FOR THE BEVERLY- BLAIR
TRUST NO. 7,
Defendants.
____________________________________/
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants Bank of America
24
N.A. (“BANA”), Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) and Federal Housing
25
Finance Agency (“FHFA”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), Defendant, Huffaker Hill Unit No. 2
26
27
28
Residence Association (the “Association”), and Defendant/Counterclaimant, Nadina Beverly,
Trustee for the Beverly-Blair Trust No. 7 (“Beverly”), by and through the parties’ respective
counsel, to extend the deadline for Beverly to oppose Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment
-1-
1
2
3
filed on October 15, 2018 (“Motion” at Doc. No. 60) to November 21, 2018.
Beverly’s opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion is currently due on November 5, 2018. Good
cause exists to extend the deadline for the reason that, as the Court has already granted Plaintiffs’
4
5
and Defendant Huffaker Hill Unit No. 2 Residence Association’s (“Association”) stipulation to
6
extend Association’s deadline to respond to the Motion until November 21, 2018, to allow
7
Beverly the same time to respond would allow Beverly’s counsel to coordinate his opposition
8
with Association’s, and for the added reason that Beverly’s counsel was absent from his office
9
for a portion of October, and requires additional time to more fully research his client’s
10
11
12
opposition.
In consideration of the above extension, the parties further stipulate that Plaintiffs shall
13
have through December 12, 2018, in which to file their respective reply briefs to both
14
Association’s and to Beverly’s opposition briefs, in support of their Motion.
15
This is the Parties’ first request for an extension regarding Beverly’s opposition and to set
16
17
18
a deadline for the filing of any reply briefs and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to
any party.
19
DATED this 1st day of November 2018.
DATED this 2nd day of November 2018.
20
DAVID E. ADKINS, ESQ.
AKERMAN, LLP
/s/ David E. Adkins, Esq.
DAVID E. ADKINS, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 4503
611 Sierra Rose Drive, Suite B
Reno, NV 89511
Tel: (775) 636-6222
Email: david@algnv.com
Attorney for Nadina Blair, Trustee for
Beverly-Blair Trust No. 7
/s/ Jared M. Sechrist, Esq.
JARED M. SECHRIST, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 10439
ARIEL STERN, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No. 8276
1160 Town Center Drive, Ste. 330
Las Vegas, NV 89144
Tel: (702) 634-5000
Email: jared.sechrist@akerman.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Bank of America, N.A.
& Federal National Mortgage Association
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?