Mendoza v. LeGrand et al
Filing
31
ORDER directing Respondents within 45 days to answer ECF No. 26 Second Amended Petition - Petitioner to reply within 45 days thereafter; granting Petitioner's ECF No. 29 Motion to Partially Waive LR IA 10-3(e). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
ARMANDO C. MENDOZA,
10
11
12
Case No. 3:15-cv-00507-MMD-VPC
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
ROBERT LEGRAND, et al.,
Respondents.
13
14
15
Petitioner has filed a second amended petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No.
16
26). The Court has reviewed it, and respondents will need to file an answer or other
17
response to it.
18
19
Petitioner also has filed a motion to partially waive Local Rule IA 10-3(e) (ECF No.
29). The Court grants this motion.
20
It is therefore ordered that respondents will have forty-five (45) days from the date
21
of entry of this order to answer or otherwise respond to the second amended petition.
22
(ECF No. 26.) Respondents must raise all potential affirmative defenses in the initial
23
responsive pleading, including lack of exhaustion and procedural default. Successive
24
motions to dismiss will not be entertained. If respondents file and serve an answer, then
25
they must comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United
26
States District Courts, and then petitioner will have forty-five (45) days from the date on
27
which the answer is served to file a reply. If respondents file a motion, then the briefing
28
schedule of Local Rule LR 7-2 will apply.
1
2
3
It is further ordered that petitioner’s motion to partially waive Local Rule IA 10-3(e)
(ECF No. 29) is granted.
DATED THIS 17th day of August 2017.
4
5
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?