Kinford v. Pincock et al

Filing 52

ORDER indicating that the Court would grant ECF No. 51 Motion for Relief from Judgment if the Court of Appeals were to remand for that purpose. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 2/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9
10

STEVEN KINFORD,

11
12

Plaintiff,
vs.

13
14
15

JAMES PINCOCK et al.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

3:15-cv-00512-RCJ-WGC
ORDER

16
17

Plaintiff sued Defendants in state court alleging deliberate indifference under the Eighth
18
19

Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state negligence law based on allegedly defective

20

facial reconstruction surgery. Defendants removed. The Court granted Defendants’ motion to

21

dismiss at the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. The Magistrate Judge had

22

recommended dismissal of the action with prejudice but also recommended keeping the case

23

open to give Plaintiff an opportunity to amend to make allegations of unlawful retaliation against
24
25

two new defendants. The Court nominally adopted the report and recommendation in full but in

26

substance rejected it in part, ordering the Clerk to close the case.

27
28
1

1

Plaintiff has now asked the Court to clarify the procedural posture of the case. The Court

2

interprets the motion as a motion for relief from judgment under Rule 60(a). The Court has lost

3

jurisdiction to the Court of Appeals, however, and can only make an indicative ruling under Rule

4

62.1. If the Court of Appeals were to remand for the limited purpose of ruling on the present

5

motion, the Court would rule that it made an oversight as contemplated under Rule 60(a) when it
6
7
8

dismissed without leave to amend to make allegations of unlawful retaliation against the two
proposed defendants.

9
10

CONCLUSION
IT IS HEREBY INDICATED that the Court WOULD GRANT the Motion for Relief

11

from Judgment (ECF No. 51) if the Court of Appeals were to remand for that purpose.
12
13
14

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 6th 17th day of February, 2017.
Dated thisThisday of February, 2017.

15
16
17
18

_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2