Kinford v. Pincock et al

Filing 74

ORDER Adopting and Accepting ECF No. 65 Report and Recommendation : The previously dismissed claims against Dr. Pincock is without jurisdiction to consider the claims in the Third Amended Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the claims aga inst Warden Baca and Warden Neven are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Mediation (ECF # 64 ) is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 6/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3
4
5

STEVEN KINFORD,

6

CASE NO.: 3:15-CV-00512-RCJ-WGC
Plaintiff,
ORDER

7

v.

8

JAMES PINCOCK, et al.,

9

Defendants.
_______________________________________

10
11

Before the Court is the Reports and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 651)

12

entered on April 21, 2017, recommending that the Court that certain claims be dismissed. On May 5,

13

2017, Plaintiff filed his Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 66).

14
15

The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of

16

the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant

17

to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s

18

Reports and Recommendation (ECF No. 65) entered on April 21, 2017, should be ADOPTED AND

19

ACCEPTED.

20
21
22
23

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED The previously dismissed claims against Dr. Pincock is without
jurisdiction to consider the claims in the Third Amended Complaint.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the claims against Warden Baca and Warden Neven are
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

24

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Mediation (ECF #64) is DENIED as MOOT.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of June, 2017.

26
27

_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES

28

1

Refers to court’s docket number.