Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc., vs Pinnacle Minerals, Inc.
Filing
18
ORDER granting 13 Motion to Stay, staying case; denying without prejudice 12 Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/4/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
______________________________________
)
)
GOLDEN PHOENIX MINERALS, INC.,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
vs.
)
)
PINNACLE MINERALS, INC.,
)
)
Respondent.
)
)
3:15-cv-00521-RCJ-WGC
ORDER
12
In 2013, Respondent Pinnacle Minerals, Inc. sued Petitioner Golden Phoenix Minerals,
13
14
Inc. in this District on two promissory notes. That case, No. 2:13-cv-915, was assigned to the
15
Hon. Miranda Du. Before any answer or motion for summary judgment was filed, Respondent
16
voluntarily dismissed as of right because the parties had agreed to arbitrate the claims. The Hon.
17
Jerry Carr Whitehead (Ret.) is presiding over the ongoing arbitration. Petitioner filed a
18
counterclaim for breach of contract. The arbitrator ruled in favor of Petitioner, awarding it
19
$573,469. Petitioner filed the present action for confirmation of the arbitration award in state
20
court. Respondent removed and filed motions to vacate the award and to stay the case until the
21
arbitrator rules on a pending motion to reconsider. Petitioner has filed a notice of non-opposition
22
as to the motion to stay.
23
///
24
1 of 2
CONCLUSION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Stay (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED, and the
case is STAYED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (ECF No. 12)
is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated thisThis 4day of of December, 2015.
DATED: 23rd th day November, 2015.
8
9
10
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?