Golden Phoenix Minerals, Inc., vs Pinnacle Minerals, Inc.

Filing 18

ORDER granting 13 Motion to Stay, staying case; denying without prejudice 12 Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/4/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 ______________________________________ ) ) GOLDEN PHOENIX MINERALS, INC., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) vs. ) ) PINNACLE MINERALS, INC., ) ) Respondent. ) ) 3:15-cv-00521-RCJ-WGC ORDER 12 In 2013, Respondent Pinnacle Minerals, Inc. sued Petitioner Golden Phoenix Minerals, 13 14 Inc. in this District on two promissory notes. That case, No. 2:13-cv-915, was assigned to the 15 Hon. Miranda Du. Before any answer or motion for summary judgment was filed, Respondent 16 voluntarily dismissed as of right because the parties had agreed to arbitrate the claims. The Hon. 17 Jerry Carr Whitehead (Ret.) is presiding over the ongoing arbitration. Petitioner filed a 18 counterclaim for breach of contract. The arbitrator ruled in favor of Petitioner, awarding it 19 $573,469. Petitioner filed the present action for confirmation of the arbitration award in state 20 court. Respondent removed and filed motions to vacate the award and to stay the case until the 21 arbitrator rules on a pending motion to reconsider. Petitioner has filed a notice of non-opposition 22 as to the motion to stay. 23 /// 24 1 of 2 CONCLUSION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Stay (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED, and the case is STAYED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Vacate Arbitration Award (ECF No. 12) is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated thisThis 4day of of December, 2015. DATED: 23rd th day November, 2015. 8 9 10 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?