Baker v. Social Security
Filing
6
Please disregard. Docketed in incorrect case. ORDER Amended Petition due within 90 days. Courtesy copy of exhibits must be mailed to staff attorney in Reno Division. Please see attached for further details and deadlines. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/16/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JC) Modified on 12/16/2015 (JC).
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
EDWARD G. RODRIGUEZ,
10
11
12
13
Case No. 3:15-cv-00339-MMD-WGC
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
R. BAKER, et al.,
Respondents.
14
This action is a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28
15
U.S.C. § 2254 by a Nevada state prisoner. On November 13, 2015, this Court granted
16
petitioner’s motion for counsel and appointed the Federal Public Defender to represent
17
petitioner in this action. (Dkt. no. 6.) On December 14, 2015, Kenneth Lee of the
18
Federal Public Defender’s Office appeared on behalf of petitioner. (Dkt. no. 8.) The
19
Court now sets a schedule for further proceedings in this action.
20
It is therefore ordered that counsel for petitioner meet with petitioner as soon as
21
reasonably possible, if counsel has not already done so, to: (a) review the procedures
22
applicable in cases under 28 U.S.C. § 2254; (b) discuss and explore with petitioner, as
23
fully as possible, the potential grounds for habeas corpus relief in petitioner’s case; and
24
(c) advise petitioner that all possible grounds for habeas corpus relief must be raised at
25
this time in this action and that the failure to do so will likely result in any omitted
26
grounds being barred from future review.
27
It is further ordered that petitioner will have ninety (90) days from the date of
28
entry of this order, to file and serve on respondents an amended petition
1
for writ of habeas corpus, which must include all known grounds for relief (both
2
exhausted and unexhausted).
3
It is further ordered that respondents will have thirty (30) days after service of an
4
amended petition within which to answer, or otherwise respond to, the amended
5
petition. If petitioner does not file an amended petition, respondents will have thirty (30)
6
days from the date on which the amended petition is due within which to answer, or
7
otherwise respond to, petitioner’s original petition.
8
9
It is further ordered that if and when respondents file an answer, petitioner will
have thirty (30) days after service of the answer to file and serve a reply.
10
It is further ordered that any state court record exhibits filed by the parties herein
11
must be filed with an index of exhibits identifying the exhibits by number or letter. The
12
CM/ECF attachments that are filed must further be identified by the number or numbers
13
(or letter or letters) of the exhibits in the attachment.
14
It is further ordered that the parties must send courtesy (paper) copies of all
15
exhibits presented in support of the amended petition and the response to the amended
16
petition to the Reno Division of this Court. Courtesy copies must be mailed to the Clerk
17
of Court, 400 S. Virginia St., Reno, NV, 89501, and directed to the attention of “Staff
18
Attorney” on the outside of the mailing address label. Additionally, in the future, all
19
parties must provide courtesy copies of any additional exhibits submitted to the Court in
20
this case, in the manner described above.
21
It is further ordered that the Clerk of Court will modify the docket to remove
22
petitioner’s address from the CM/ECF docket and replace it with the address for the
23
Federal Public Defender’s Office, as indicated on the notice of appearance.
24
25
26
It is further ordered that petitioner file no further pro se documents and proceed
by and through appointed counsel.
DATED THIS 16th day of December 2015.
27
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?