Olausen v. Yup

Filing 15

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS of the Honorable Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, on 9/20/2016, denying Plaintiff's ECF No. 13 Motion for a Scheduling Order. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA JOHN S. OLAUSEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) GENE YUP, ) ) Defendant. ) ________________________________________) 3:15-cv-00539-MMD-WGC MINUTES OF THE COURT September 20, 2016 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion for a Scheduling Order (ECF No. 13). Defendant has opposed the motion (ECF No. 14). Plaintiff requests that a Scheduling Order be issued setting the course of the proceedings and allowing Plaintiff to conduct discovery. Defendant Dr. Yup has yet to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s civil rights complaint (ECF No. 4). In the Court’s Order of August 4, 2016 (ECF No. 11), Defendant was given sixty (60) days from that date to file an answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 11). Defendant Yup’s response to Plaintiff’s complaint is not due until October 3, 2016. The Court will not enter a Scheduling Order at this time as Plaintiff’s request for discovery is premature. Plaintiff’s Motion for a Scheduling Order (ECF No. 13) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?