Olausen v. Yup
Filing
52
ORDER DENYING ECF No. 51 Motion to Stay. Clerk's Office shall send Plaintiff copies of the Screening Order (ECF No. 3 ), Complaint (ECF No. 4 ), Status Report (ECF No. 9 ), Defendant's Answer (ECF No. 16 ), and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 17 ). (Specified docs mailed to P 5/5/2017.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have to and including June 5, 2017, in which to file his response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 44 ). There shall be no further extensions granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 5/5/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JOHN S. OLAUSEN,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
GENE YUP,
)
)
Defendant.
)
________________________________________)
3:15-cv-00539-MMD-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
May 5, 2017
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay (ECF No. 51). Plaintiff requests the court to
(1) grant Plaintiff time to consult with his approved inmate legal assistant in order to prepare a
response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) grant Plaintiff time for the Clerk’s
Office to provide copies of documents pursuant to the court’s order (ECF No. 25) and Plaintiff’s
notice (ECF No. 28).
Although Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay (ECF No. 51) is DENIED, IT IS ORDERED that the
Clerk’s Office shall send Plaintiff copies of the Screening Order (ECF No. 3), Complaint
(ECF No. 4), Status Report (ECF No. 9), Defendant’s Answer (ECF No. 16), and Scheduling Order
(ECF No. 17).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have to and including June 5, 2017, in
which to file his response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 44). There shall
be no further extensions granted.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?