Keller v. Baca

Filing 43

ORDER that petitioner file a response to ECF No. 41 Order by 5/25/2018, including by motion to stay and abey; failure to respond to the Court's Order may result in dismissal of his habeas petition without prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 *** 8 BRET HENRY KELLER, 9 10 11 12 Case No. 3:15-cv-00563-MMD-VPC Petitioner, ORDER v. ISIDRO BACA, et al., Respondents. 13 On February 13, 2018, the Court granted Respondents’ motion to dismiss in part 14 and, finding that the petition is mixed, directed petitioner to either abandon his 15 unexhausted claims, move to dismiss the entire petition, or file a motion to stay and abey 16 within thirty days of the date of the Court’s Order. (ECF No. 41.) 17 On May 10, 2018, the Court received a letter from Petitioner indicating that he had 18 filed a motion to stay and abey but that he had not received any decision from the Court. 19 (ECF No. 42.) Petitioner is advised that the Court has not received any response to its 20 February 13, 2018 Order from Petitioner, including any motion to stay. 21 It is therefore ordered that Petitioner file a response to the Court’s February 13, 22 2018 Order, including by motion to stay and abey if he so elects, within fifteen days of the 23 date of this Order. Petitioner’s failure to respond to the Court’s Order may result in 24 dismissal of his habeas petition without prejudice. 25 DATED THIS 10th day of May 2018. 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?