Keller v. Baca

Filing 60

ORDER that Ground 1 is dismissed in its entirety and Ground 2 is dismissed the extent it asserts that attorney Edwards was ineffective for failing to object to Petitioner's sentence as constitutionally disproportionate and for failingto argue o n appeal that the plea was involuntary. Respondent's answer to remaining claims due 12/7/2016; Petitioner will have 45 days from service of the answer to file a reply. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 BRET HENRY KELLER, 7 8 9 10 11 12 Case No. 3:15-cv-00563-MMD-VPC Petitioner, ORDER v. ISIDRO BACA, et al., Respondents. This is a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 initiated by a Nevada state prisoner. 13 On February 13, 2018, the Court entered an order finding that Ground 1 and part 14 of Ground 2 of the Petition were unexhausted. (ECF No. 41.) Petitioner has elected to 15 dismiss his unexhausted claims and proceed on his exhausted claims. (ECF No. 59). 16 Accordingly, it is therefore ordered that Ground 1 is dismissed in its entirety and 17 Ground 2 is dismissed the extent it asserts that attorney Edwards was ineffective for 18 failing to object to Petitioner’s sentence as constitutionally disproportionate and for failing 19 to argue on appeal that the plea was involuntary. 20 21 22 23 24 It is further ordered that within forty-five days of the date of this order Respondents must file an answer addressing all remaining claims in the Petition on the merits. It is further ordered that Petitioner will have forty-five days from service of the answer within which to file a reply. DATED THIS 23rd day of October 2018. 25 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?