Keller v. Baca
Filing
60
ORDER that Ground 1 is dismissed in its entirety and Ground 2 is dismissed the extent it asserts that attorney Edwards was ineffective for failing to object to Petitioner's sentence as constitutionally disproportionate and for failingto argue o n appeal that the plea was involuntary. Respondent's answer to remaining claims due 12/7/2016; Petitioner will have 45 days from service of the answer to file a reply. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
BRET HENRY KELLER,
7
8
9
10
11
12
Case No. 3:15-cv-00563-MMD-VPC
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
Respondents.
This is a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254
initiated by a Nevada state prisoner.
13
On February 13, 2018, the Court entered an order finding that Ground 1 and part
14
of Ground 2 of the Petition were unexhausted. (ECF No. 41.) Petitioner has elected to
15
dismiss his unexhausted claims and proceed on his exhausted claims. (ECF No. 59).
16
Accordingly, it is therefore ordered that Ground 1 is dismissed in its entirety and
17
Ground 2 is dismissed the extent it asserts that attorney Edwards was ineffective for
18
failing to object to Petitioner’s sentence as constitutionally disproportionate and for failing
19
to argue on appeal that the plea was involuntary.
20
21
22
23
24
It is further ordered that within forty-five days of the date of this order Respondents
must file an answer addressing all remaining claims in the Petition on the merits.
It is further ordered that Petitioner will have forty-five days from service of the
answer within which to file a reply.
DATED THIS 23rd day of October 2018.
25
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?