Keller v. Baca
Filing
75
ORDER - As Petitioner has failed to comply with the Local Rules, it is therefore ordered that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. Clerk is instructed to enter final judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/22/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
BRET HENRY KELLER,
Case No. 3:15-cv-00563-MMD-CLB
Petitioner,
7
ORDER
v.
8
9
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
Respondents.
10
11
12
This habeas matter is before the Court on Petitioner Bret Henry Keller’s failure to
13
comply with the Court’s Order (ECF No. 73) instructing him to update his address within
14
30 days. The U.S. Postal Service has returned court mail from the last institutional address
15
provided by Petitioner with a notation indicating that he no longer is at the institution and
16
has been paroled. See Mail Returned Undeliverable (ECF Nos. 72, 74.) The inmate locator
17
tool on the Nevada Department of Corrections’ (“NDOC”) website similarly reflects that
18
Petitioner has been released. 1
19
The Local Rules of Practice require all parties, including habeas petitioners, to
20
immediately file with the Court written notice of any change of address. LR IA 3-1, LR 2-
21
2. The Local Rules also warn that failure to comply may result in dismissal of the action,
22
with or without prejudice, or other sanctions as the Court deems appropriate. Id.; see also
23
Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (9th Cir. 1988) (“A party, not the district court, bears
24
the burden of keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.”).
25
On December 18, 2019, the Court ordered Petitioner to update his address within
26
27
28
1The
inmate locator tool may be accessed by the public online at
https://ofdsearch.doc.nv.gov/. The Court takes judicial notice of Petitioner’s current status
as reported in NDOC’s online records.
1
30 days. (ECF No. 73.) The Court further warned Petitioner that a failure to timely update
2
his address would result in the dismissal of his petition without prejudice and without
3
further advance notice. To date, Petitioner has not filed a notice of change of address or
4
taken any other action to prosecute this case.
As Petitioner has failed to comply with the Local Rules, it is therefore ordered that
5
6
this action is dismissed without prejudice.
The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter final judgment accordingly and close this
7
8
9
case.
DATED THIS 22nd day of January 2020.
10
11
12
MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?