Messaad v. Reno Justice Court et al
Filing
44
ORDER - Certification of Record Supplementation : The Court certifies to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that the record should be supplemented pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(e)(2)(b). The Clerk is directed to transmit this certification to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. ( E-mail notice (NEF) sent to the US Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit 6/7/2017. ) USCA case 17-16111. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
***
7
8
9
TARIK MESSAAD,
Case No. 3:15-cv-00582-MMD-VPC
Plaintiff,
Certification of Record Supplementation
v.
RENO JUSTICE CENTER, et al.,
10
Defendants.
11
12
The Court certifies to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals that the record should be
13
supplemented pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 10(e)(2)(b). The purpose
14
of the supplement is to correct a material misstatement in two orders to assist the court
15
of appeals in its review of the record and final decision. See Davis v. United States, 667
16
F.2d 822, 824 (9th Cir. 1982) (“The district court may act to assist the court of appeals in
17
the exercise of its jurisdiction.”) (internal citation omitted).
18
The Court’s two prior orders (ECF Nos. 6, 36) incorrectly assumed that Plaintiff
19
Tarik Messaad had been convicted of the crime for which he was arrested when in fact
20
the charge was pending at the initiation of this case. After the first order was issued, both
21
parties submitted records which indicate that the charge was dismissed on October 11,
22
2016. (ECF No. 24 at 1; ECF No. 16-1 at 3.)
23
24
25
The Clerk is directed to transmit this certification to the Ninth Circuit Court of
Appeals.
DATED THIS 7th day of June 2016.
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?