Rhymes v. Aranas et al

Filing 105

PRETRIAL ORDER re ECF Nos. 99 Proposed Joint Pretrial Order; 102 Stipulated Pretrial Disclosures : Calendar Call set for 2/3/2020 at 10:00 AM in Reno Courtroom 3 before Judge Robert C. Jones. Stacked Jury Trial set for 2/10/2020 at 8:30 AM in Reno Courtroom 3 before Judge Robert C. Jones. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
This case is set for jury trial on stacked calendar on February 10, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. in Reno Courtroom 3 before Judge Robert C. Jones. Calendar Call will take place on Monday, February 3, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. in Reno Courtroom 3 before Judge Robert C. Jones. IT IS SO ORDERED . . . . ______________________ Robert C. Jones United States District Judge . . Dated:________________ November 1, 2019. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 AARON D. FORD Attorney General DENNIS W. HOUGH, BAR NO. 11995 Deputy Attorney General State of Nevada Public Safety Division 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, NV 89701-4717 Tel: (775) 684-1254 E-mail: dhough@ag.nv.gov Attorneys for Defendants Cynthia Sablica, and Dwight Nevin 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 MICHAEL RHYMES, Case No. 3:15-cv-00592-RCJ-CBC Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 C. ROWLEY, et al., PARTIES’ PROPOSED JOINT PRETRIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 26(a)(3) (JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER) 14 Defendants. 15 Following pretrial proceedings in this case, 16 IT IS ORDERED: 17 I. NATURE OF ACTION AND CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES 18 A. 19 This is an inmate civil rights action brought by Michael Rhymes, (Rhymes) pursuant to 42 20 U.S.C. § 1983. Rhymes is a prisoner in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections (NDOC), 21 currently housed at Lovelock Correctional Center (LCC). Rhymes is serving a life sentence with 22 possibility for parole for lewdness with a minor. 23 NATURE OF ACTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF PARTIES Rhymes submitted his First Amended civil rights complaint on May 5, 2016, alleging, among 24 other things, that: 25 Defendants Sablica and Nevin were deliberately indifferent to Rhymes’ serious medical condition by 26 failing to provide a prescribed medication for Rhymes’ type 2 diabetes. 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 B. 2 CONTENTIONS OF THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff’s Contentions 3 Rhymes contends that Sablica failed to respond to his requests for the previously prescribed 4 medication, and that both Sablica and Nevin were aware of the situation because he spoke to each of 5 them personally about the failure to provide the prescribed medication. 6 2. Defendant’s Contentions Defendants contend that the evidence does not support Plaintiff’s allegations. 7 Defendants 8 incorporate any Affirmative Defenses from the Answer as it pertains to Defendants Sablica and Nevin. 9 Defendants deny that Plaintiff’s constitutional rights have been violated. 10 C. 11 Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages of $150,000 and punitive damages in the amount of 12 $75,000 dollars. Plaintiff also seeks a permanent injunction prohibiting High Desert State Prison from 13 going more than 72 hours to provide prescribed medication. 14 II. RELIEF SOUGHT STATEMENT OF JURISDICTION This is a civil action commenced under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This Court has jurisdiction pursuant 15 16 to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. 17 III. UNCONTESTED FACTS ADMITTED BY THE PARTIES WHICH REQUIRE NO 18 PROOF 19 1. Rhymes is, and at all times herein was, an inmate in the custody of the NDOC, currently 20 residing at Lovelock Correctional Center. 21 Complaint. 2. 22 23 Defendants Sablica, and Nevin were, during the events in question, employees of the NDOC. 3. 24 25 Rhymes was incarcerated at all times relevant to the On December 2013, Rhymes was prescribed Hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg, Metformen HCL 500mg, Lisinopril 20mg, and Glipizide 5mg. 4. 26 On January 22, 27 Rhymes Hydrochlorothiazide, and Lisinopril. 28 2014, /// 2 requested refills on Glipizide, Metformin, 5. 1 2 and Lisinopril. 6. 3 4 On January 26, 2014, Rhymes signed for Glipizide, Metformin, Hydrochlorothiazide, On March 5, 2014 Rhymes requested refills on Glipizide, Metformin, Hydrochlorothiazide, and Lisinopril. 5 7. On March 13, 2014 Rhymes was prescribed Metformin. 6 8. On 7 15, 2014 Rhymes signed receipt of Glipizide, Metformin, requested refills for Glipizide, Metformin, Hydrochlorothiazide, and Lisinopril. 9. 8 9 March On March 22, 2014 Rhymes Hydrochlorothiazide, and Lisinopril. 10 10. On March 23, 2014 Rhymes signed a receipt for Metformin 11 11. On a date uncertain Rhymes signed a receipt for Glipizide, Metformin, 12 Hydrochlorothiazide, and Lisinopril. 13 12. 14 13. 15 On May 2, 2014, Rhymes signed for receipt of Metformin and Lisinopril. On May 20, 2014 Rhymes submitted a kite noting he did not receive Glipizide or Hydrochlorothiazide. 16 14. 17 15. 18 On May 27, 2014 Rhymes’ prescriptions for Glipizide, and Hydrochlorothiazide were renewed. 16. 19 20 On May 23, 2014 Rhymes signed a receipt for Metformin and Lisinopril. On May 29, 2014 at 6:00 a.m. Rhymes filed an informal grievance # 2006-29-79783 alleging he did not receive Glipizide or Hydrochlorothiazide. 21 17. 22 18. 23 On June 27, 2014 Rhymes requested refills of Glipizide, Metformin, Hydrochlorothiazide, and Lisinopril. 19. 24 25 On May 29, 2014 Rhymes signed a receipt for Glipizide and Hydrochlorothiazide. On June 28, 2014 Rhymes signed a receipt for Glipizide, Metformin, Hydrochlorothiazide and Lisinopril. 20. 26 On July 28, 2014 27 requested Hydrochlorothiazide and Lisinopril. 28 Rhymes /// 3 refills of Glipizide, Metformin, 21. 1 2 On August 3, 2014 Rhymes signed a receipt for Glipizide, Metformin, Hydrochlorothiazide and Lisinopril. 22. 3 On a date uncertain, while still residing at HDSP, Rhymes signed a receipt for Glipizide 4 and Hydrochlorothiazide. 5 IV. FACTS UNADMITTED THAT WILL NOT BE CONTESTED The following facts, though not admitted, will not be contested at trial by evidence to the 6 7 contrary: NONE 8 V. 9 10 CONTESTED ISSUES OF FACT TO BE TRIED AND DETERMINED UPON TRIAL A. PLAINTIFF’S CONTESTED FACTS See First Amended Complaint. 11 B. DEFENDANT’S CONTESTED FACTS 12 1. Whether Plaintiff has met his burden of producing evidence supporting the facts set forth 13 above, i.e. whether he can prove that Defendant Sablica or Nevin were aware of his medical condition 14 and deliberately and maliciously ignored that situation, resulting in injury to Plaintiff. 2. 15 Whether any form of damages is available to Plaintiff for any deliberate indifference on 16 the part of Defendants Sablica or Nevin. 17 VI. 18 A. 1. 19 20 CONTESTED ISSUES OF LAW TO BE TRIED AND DETERMINED UPON TRIAL PLAINTIFF Whether or not Defendants Sablica and Nevin were deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff’s serious medical issues. 21 B. DEFENDANTS 22 1. Did Sablica or Nevin violate Plaintiff’s constitutional rights? 23 2. As a matter of law, is Plaintiff entitled to compensatory damages of $150,000? 24 3. As a matter of law, is Plaintiff entitled to punitive damages of $75,000? 25 VII. EXHIBITS 26 A. STIPULATED EXHIBITS AS TO AUTHENTICITY AND ADMISSIBILITY 27 1. Mr. Rhymes Medical Kites and KOP Medication Log. 28 2. Progress Notes and Physicians Orders related to Mr. Rhymes maintained by NDOC. 4 1 B. STIPULATED EXHIBITS AS TO AUTHENTICITY BUT NOT ADMISSIBILITY 2 1. None. 3 C. PLAINTIFF’S EXHIBITS SUBJECT TO OBJECTIONS 4 1. 5 2. 6 3. 7 4. 8 D. DEFENDANTS’ EXHIBITS SUBJECT TO OBJECTIONS 9 1. Plaintiff’s Medical file; 10 2. Plaintiff’s Movement History Report; 11 3. Plaintiff’s housing history report; 12 4. Plaintiff’s Grievance file, including all relevant grievances; 13 5. Certified Judgment(s) of Conviction of Plaintiff for underlying offense (only if needed 14 for impeachment); 15 6. Plaintiff’s Institutional File (“I-File”); 16 7. Plaintiff’s NDOC Central File (“C-File”); 17 8. Law Library Logs; 18 9. Legal Mail Logs for relevant time period; 19 10. Law Library Brass Slips; 20 11. Plaintiff’s Case Notes as maintained on the NDOC NOTIS system from 2014 to Present. 21 12. All prison logs, registers, documents, or other form of data pertaining to any and all of 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff’s claims, especially any unauthorized mail logs or mail logs. 13. Any and all other exhibits that may support the statements of fact and law cited herein and to rebut Plaintiff’s statements, claims, and testimony. 14. Any and all other exhibits that rebut witnesses that might be called to respond to claims made by either Plaintiff or any of his proposed witnesses; 27 E. DEPOSITIONS 28 1. None. 5 1 VIII. WITNESSES 2 A. 3 Plaintiff wishes to reserve the right to call the following persons: 4 1. 5 2. 6 3. 7 B. 8 Defendants wish to reserve the right to call the following persons: 9 1. Plaintiff Michael Rhymes, Inmate, Lovelock Correctional Center; 10 2. Defendant Cynthia Sablica, c/o Dennis W. Hough, Office of Attorney General, 100 N. 11 3. 4. 5. 6. Custodian(s) of Record for any exhibits identified above, c/o Dennis W. Hough, Office Any and all rebuttal witnesses that might be called to respond to claims made by either Plaintiff or any of his witnesses. 7. 20 21 Michael Koehn, c/o Dennis W. Hough, Office of Attorney General, 100 N. Carson St. of the Attorney General, 100 N. Carson Street, Carson City, NV 89701-4717, (775) 684-1100. 18 19 Defendant Dwight Nevin, c/o Dennis W. Hough, Office of Attorney General, 100 N. Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717. 16 17 DEFENDANT’S WITNESSES: Carson St. Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717. 14 15 Himself. Carson St. Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717. 12 13 PLAINTIFF’S WITNESSES: Any and all other witnesses that have personal knowledge supporting Defendant’s statements of fact or law cited herein. 8. 22 All witnesses identified by Plaintiff, whether or not called to testify at trial. 23 Plaintiff and Defendants reserve the right to interpose objections to the calling of any named witness 24 listed above prior to or at trial. 25 IX. AVAILABLE TRIAL DATES Plaintiff and Defendants’ Counsel expressly understand that the Clerk shall set the trial of this 26 27 matter at the convenience of the Court's calendar. A jury has been requested. 28 /// 6 1 The following are three weeks in which both parties are available: 2 The week of February 3 3 The week of February 10 4 The week of February 24 5 X. TIME EXPECTED FOR TRIAL 6 It is estimated that the trial herein will take a total of 2–3 days. 7 DATED this 22nd day of October, 2019. 8 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: 9 10 11 MICHAEL RHYMES, #78115 Plaintiff Pro Se 12 13 AARON D. FORD Attorney General 14 15 16 17 /s/ Dennis W. Hough DENNIS W. HOUGH, BAR NO. 11995 Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendants 18 XI. 19 This case is set foris set foron stackedon the stacked calendar on _______________, 2019. Calendar call This case jury trial jury trial calendar on February 10, 2020 at 8:30 a.m. in Reno Courtroom 3 before Judge Robert C. Jones. Calendar Call will take place on Monday, February 3, 2020 at 10:00 a.m. in Reno Courtroom 3 before Judge 2019. will take place on _______________,Robert C. Jones. , , The parties have approved the pretrial order to this action as evidenced by their signatures or the IT IS SO ORDERED . signatures of their attorneys hereon, and the order is hereby entered and will govern the trial of this . . case. This order may not be amended except by court order and based upon the parties’ agreement or to . ______________________ prevent manifest injustice. Robert C. Jones IT United States District Judge IS SO ORDERED . . Dated:________________ 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ACTION BY THE COURT U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 27 DATED: 28 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 1 2 I certify that I am an employee of the Office of the Attorney General, State of Nevada, and that 3 on this 22nd day of October 2019, I caused to be deposited for mailing a true and correct copy of the 4 forgoing, PARTIES’ PROPOSED JOINT PRETRIAL DISCLOSURES PURSUANT TO FED. R. 5 CIV. P. 26(a)(3) (JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER), to the following: 6 7 8 9 Michael Rhymes #78115 Care of LCC Law Librarian Lovelock Correctional Center 1200 Prison Road Lovelock, Nevada 89419 lcclawlibrary@doc.nv.gov 10 11 12 /s/ Perla M. Hernandez ________ An employee of the Office of the Attorney General 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?