Rhymes v. Aranas et al
ORDER - Plaintiff's motion to extend time for discovery as to Aranas (ECF No. 29 ) is DENIED. Defendants' motion to stay discovery (ECF No. 33 ) as to defendants Aranas and Cox is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 8/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
MINUTES OF THE COURT
August 30, 2017
THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is plaintiff’s motion to extend time for discovery as to defendant Romeo
Aranas. (ECF No. 29.) Defendants opposed (ECF No. 30), and plaintiff replied (ECF No. 31).
This court recommended that defendants’ motion to dismiss Aranas as a defendant be granted,
and therefore, plaintiff’s motion to extend time for discovery as to Aranas (ECF No. 29) is
Also before the court is defendants’ motion to stay discover as to defendants Romeo
Aranas and James “Greg” Cox (ECF No. 33), pending the resolution of defendants’ partial
motion to dismiss (ECF No. 32). No opposition was filed. This court recommended that
defendants’ motion to dismiss Aranas and Cox be granted. Therefore, pending a ruling on this
court’s report and recommendation by the District Court, defendants’ motion to stay discovery
(ECF No. 33) as to defendants Aranas and Cox is GRANTED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?