Meeks v. Sorsi et al
Filing
11
ORDER - ECF No. 1 IFP Application is GRANTED. NDOC shall pay clerk from inmate account. Clerk shall SEND copy this order to Finance and to NDOC Inmate Services. (NEF to Finance; copy to NDOC on 9/7/2016.) Clerk shall E-SERVE AG with this order and ECF No. 6 Complaint ( E-service 9/7/2016; complaint via NEF regeneration. ) AG shall file notice re acceptance of service by 9/28/2016; and file under seal Ds' address(es) for which service not accepted. If service not accepted then P shall f ile a motion. If service accepted then answer to complaint due by 11/6/2016. Henceforth P shall serve Ds a copy of every pleading submitted for consideration, together with a certificate of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/7/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
13
ANDREW I. MEEKS, II,
)
)
Plaintiff,
) Case No. 3:15-cv-00627-MMD-WGC
)
v.
)
)
SORSI, et al.,
)
ORDER
)
Defendants.
)
)
___________________________________ )
14
This action is a pro se civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 by a state
15
prisoner. Plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 1).
16
Based on the financial information provided, the Court finds that Plaintiff is unable to prepay
17
the full filing fee in this matter.
18
The Court entered a screening order on June 9, 2016. (ECF No. 5). The screening
19
order imposed a 90-day stay and the Court entered a subsequent order in which the parties
20
were assigned to mediation by a court-appointed mediator. (ECF No. 5, 8). The Office of the
21
Attorney General has filed a status report indicating that settlement has not been reached and
22
informing the Court of its intent to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 10).
23
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS ORDERED that:
24
1.
Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED.
25
Plaintiff shall not be required to pay an initial installment of the filing fee. In the event that this
26
action is dismissed, the full filing fee must still be paid pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
27
///
28
///
1
2.
The movant herein is permitted to maintain this action to conclusion without the
2
necessity of prepayment of any additional fees or costs or the giving of security therefor. This
3
order granting leave to proceed in forma pauperis shall not extend to the issuance and/or
4
service of subpoenas at government expense.
5
3.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2), the Nevada Department of Corrections shall
6
pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court, District of Nevada, 20% of the preceding
7
month’s deposits to Plaintiff’s account (Andrew L. Meeks, #52872), in the months that the
8
account exceeds $10.00, until the full $350.00 filing fee has been paid for this action. The
9
Clerk of the Court shall SEND a copy of this order to the Finance Division of the Clerk’s Office.
10
The Clerk of the Court shall also SEND a copy of this order to the attention of the Chief of
11
Inmate Services for the Nevada Department of Corrections, P.O. Box 7011, Carson City, NV
12
89702.
13
4.
The Clerk of the Court shall electronically SERVE a copy of this order and a copy
14
of Plaintiff’s complaint (ECF No. 6) on the Office of the Attorney General of the State of
15
Nevada, attention Kat Howe.
16
5.
Subject to the findings of the screening order (ECF No. 5), within twenty-one
17
(21) days of the date of entry of this order, the Attorney General’s Office shall file a notice
18
advising the Court and Plaintiff of: (a) the names of the defendants for whom it accepts
19
service; (b) the names of the defendants for whom it does not accept service, and (c) the
20
names of the defendants for whom it is filing the last-known-address information under seal.
21
As to any of the named defendants for whom the Attorney General’s Office cannot accept
22
service, the Office shall file, under seal, but shall not serve the inmate Plaintiff the last known
23
address(es) of those defendant(s) for whom it has such information. If the last known address
24
of the defendant(s) is a post office box, the Attorney General's Office shall attempt to obtain
25
and provide the last known physical address(es).
26
6.
If service cannot be accepted for any of the named defendant(s), Plaintiff shall
27
file a motion identifying the unserved defendant(s), requesting issuance of a summons, and
28
specifying a full name and address for the defendant(s). For the defendant(s) as to which the
2
1
Attorney General has not provided last-known-address information, Plaintiff shall provide the
2
full name and address for the defendant(s).
3
7.
If the Attorney General accepts service of process for any named defendant(s),
4
such defendant(s) shall file and serve an answer or other response to the complaint within
5
sixty (60) days from the date of this order.
6
8.
Henceforth, Plaintiff shall serve upon defendant(s) or, if an appearance has been
7
entered by counsel, upon their attorney(s), a copy of every pleading, motion or other document
8
submitted for consideration by the Court. Plaintiff shall include with the original document
9
submitted for filing a certificate stating the date that a true and correct copy of the document
10
was mailed or electronically filed to the defendants or counsel for the defendants. If counsel
11
has entered a notice of appearance, Plaintiff shall direct service to the individual attorney
12
named in the notice of appearance, at the physical or electronic address stated therein. The
13
Court may disregard any document received by a district judge or magistrate judge which has
14
not been filed with the Clerk, and any document received by a district judge, magistrate judge,
15
or the Clerk which fails to include a certificate showing proper service.
16
DATED: September 7, 2016.
17
18
_________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?