Meeks v. Sorsi et al
Filing
16
ORDER granting in part and denying in part ECF No. 14 Motion extension of copywork. Plaintiff's copy work limit shall be increased by $10.00 (which should provide Plaintiff up to 100 copies). Clerk directed to send a copy of this order to the Chief of Inmate Services for NDOP so that the funds can be properly allocated. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 09/20/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
ANDREW L. MEEKS, II,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SORSI, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
3:15-cv-00627-MMD-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
September 20, 2016
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KATIE OGDEN
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Plaintiff’s motion requesting an extension of his copy work limit in excess
of $500.00 (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff states he has exceeded his copy work limit and needs to serve
all pleadings, papers, exhibits and documentary evidence on Defendants. The Court notes
Defendants filed their Notice of Appearance (ECF No. 13), but have not yet answered Plaintiff’s
complaint which appears to be due on or before November 6, 2016. Plaintiff has not demonstrated
why he requires an additional 5000 pages of copy work. Defendants’ opposition merely suggests
a more appropriate extension in the sum of $10.00. (ECF No. 15.)
Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff’s copy work limit shall
be increased by $10.00 (which should provide Plaintiff up to 100 copies). The Clerk shall send a
copy of this order extending copy work to the Chief of Inmate Services for NDOP (P.O. Box 7011
Carson City, NV 89702) so that the funds can be properly allocated.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By:
/s/
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?