Meeks v. Sorsi et al

Filing 16

ORDER granting in part and denying in part ECF No. 14 Motion extension of copywork. Plaintiff's copy work limit shall be increased by $10.00 (which should provide Plaintiff up to 100 copies). Clerk directed to send a copy of this order to the Chief of Inmate Services for NDOP so that the funds can be properly allocated. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 09/20/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ANDREW L. MEEKS, II, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SORSI, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ ) 3:15-cv-00627-MMD-WGC MINUTES OF THE COURT September 20, 2016 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Before the court is Plaintiff’s motion requesting an extension of his copy work limit in excess of $500.00 (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff states he has exceeded his copy work limit and needs to serve all pleadings, papers, exhibits and documentary evidence on Defendants. The Court notes Defendants filed their Notice of Appearance (ECF No. 13), but have not yet answered Plaintiff’s complaint which appears to be due on or before November 6, 2016. Plaintiff has not demonstrated why he requires an additional 5000 pages of copy work. Defendants’ opposition merely suggests a more appropriate extension in the sum of $10.00. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED IN PART. Plaintiff’s copy work limit shall be increased by $10.00 (which should provide Plaintiff up to 100 copies). The Clerk shall send a copy of this order extending copy work to the Chief of Inmate Services for NDOP (P.O. Box 7011 Carson City, NV 89702) so that the funds can be properly allocated. IT IS SO ORDERED. LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?