Towles v. Baca et al
ORDER clarifying that briefing deadlines set forth in ECF No. 8 Scheduling Order remain in effect, with exception that response to ECF No. 9 / 10 Amended Petition due within 90 days of 11/29/2016. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 1/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
DEE V. TOWLES,
Case No. 3:16-cv-00050-HDM-WGC
BACA, et al.,
In its order dated November 29, 2016, this court directed that the f ilings at ECF
Nos. 9 and 10—taken together—shall constitute petitioner Dee V. Towles’ amended
habeas petition (ECF No. 13). The court now clarifies that the briefing deadlines set
forth in the scheduling order at ECF No. 8 remain in effect, with the exception that
respondents’ response to the petition is due on or bef ore ninety days from November
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: January 26, 2017.
HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?