Towles v. Baca et al

Filing 16

ORDER clarifying that briefing deadlines set forth in ECF No. 8 Scheduling Order remain in effect, with exception that response to ECF No. 9 / 10 Amended Petition due within 90 days of 11/29/2016. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 1/26/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

DEE V. TOWLES,

10

Case No. 3:16-cv-00050-HDM-WGC
Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
11
BACA, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14

In its order dated November 29, 2016, this court directed that the f ilings at ECF

15

Nos. 9 and 10—taken together—shall constitute petitioner Dee V. Towles’ amended

16

habeas petition (ECF No. 13). The court now clarifies that the briefing deadlines set

17

forth in the scheduling order at ECF No. 8 remain in effect, with the exception that

18

respondents’ response to the petition is due on or bef ore ninety days from November

19

29, 2016.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

DATED: January 26, 2017.

23
24
HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

25
26
27
28
1