Towles v. Baca et al
Filing
5
ORDER that by 11/03/2016 Petitioner shall submit either the $5.00 filing fee or a fully completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 10/04/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
***
DEE V. TOWLES,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 3:16-cv-00050-HDM-WGC
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
BACA, et al.,
Respondents.
16
Petitioner has submitted a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus, pursuant to
17
28 U.S.C. § 2254, and a financial certificate (ECF Nos. 1-1, 1-3). He has not, however,
18
submitted a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or the required inmate
19
account statements for the past sixth months. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Local Rule
20
LSR1-2. Petitioner submitted both a “notice” and a “letter” to the Clerk indicating his
21
belief that $14.88 was sent or transferred from his inmate account to the Clerk as the
22
filing fee to initiate this action (ECF Nos. 3, 4). The Clerk’s records do not reflect receipt
23
of any funds from Towles. Accordingly, petitioner shall have thirty (30) days to submit
24
either the $5.00 filing fee or a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis.
25
Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice.
26
27
28
1
1
2
3
4
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the date of this
5
order petitioner shall submit either the $5.00 filing fee or a fully completed application to
6
proceed in forma pauperis.
7
8
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that failure to do so may result in the dismissal of
this action without prejudice.
9
10
Dated: October 4, 2016.
11
HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?