Anderson v. NDOC et al
ORDER - Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 66 is ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED. Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27 ) is GRANTED, EXCEPT as to the retaliation claim against Defendant Parks. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
JOSEPH M. ANDERSON,
CASE NO.: 3:16-CV-00056-RCJ-WGC
JAMES “GREG” COX, et al.,
Before the Court is the Reports and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge (ECF #661)
entered on August 17, 2017, recommending that the Court grant Defendants’ Motion For Summary
Judgment (ECF No. 27), EXCEPT as to the retaliation claim against Defendant Parks. On August 24,
2017, Plaintiff filed his Objections to Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 69) and Defendants filed
their Opposition to Plaintiff’s Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No.
72) on September 9, 2017.
The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of
the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s
Reports and Recommendation (ECF #66) entered on August 17, 2017, should be ADOPTED AND
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment (ECF No. 27)is
GRANTED, EXCEPT as to the retaliation claim against Defendant Parks.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED this 20th day of September, 2017.
ROBERT C. JONES
Refers to court’s docket number.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?