Anderson v. NDOC et al
JUDGMENT - Defendants' Motion For Summary Judgment (ECFNo. 27 ) is GRANTED, EXCEPT as to the retaliation claim against Defendant Parks. Signed by Clerk of Court Debra K. Kempi on 9/20/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
AO 450 (Rev. 5/85) Judgment in a Civil Case r
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
JOSEPH M. ANDERSON,
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
CASE NUMBER: 3:16-CV-00056-RCJ-WGC
JAMES “GREG” COX, et al.,,
Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried
and the jury has rendered its verdict.
Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been
tried or heard and a decision has been rendered.
Decision by Court. This action came to be considered before the Court. The issues have been
considered and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants’ Motion For Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 27)is GRANTED, EXCEPT as to the retaliation claim against Defendant Parks.
September 20, 2017
DEBRA K. KEMPI
/s/ D. R. Morgan
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?