Mesi et al v. Select Portfolio Servicing et al
Filing
92
ORDER that the motions ECF Nos. 82 , 90 are DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
BETTY MESI et al.,
8
Plaintiffs,
9
3:16-cv-00065-RCJ-WGC
vs.
10
11
ORDER
SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING et al.,
Defendants.
12
This case arises from a foreclosure of real property. On April 16, 2018, the Court
13
14
dismissed this action with prejudice after finding it was duplicative of another previously-filed
15
case: Mesi v. U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n, No. 3:15-cv-555-RCJ-WGC (filed Nov. 13, 2015). (Order,
16
ECF No. 81.) On April 25, Plaintiffs filed a motion “for reversal of foreclosure and for
17
sanctions.” (Mot., ECF No. 82.) Then, on April 27, Plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal. On May
18
12, Plaintiff filed another motion, this time seeking to strike Defendants’ responses to the motion
19
for reversal of foreclosure. (Mot., ECF No. 90.) Finally, on June 26, the Ninth Circuit granted
20
Plaintiffs’ motion to proceed with their appeal in forma pauperis, acknowledged receipt of
21
Plaintiffs’ opening brief, and set a deadline for Defendants’ answering briefs. (Order, ECF No.
22
91.)
23
24
As of now, the entirety of this case has been disposed and an appeal is currently pending.
Therefore, the Court lacks jurisdiction to reach the merits of Plaintiffs’ motions. “Once a notice
1 of 2
1
of appeal is filed, the district court is divested of jurisdiction over the matters being appealed.”
2
Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc. v. Sw. Marine Inc., 242 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th Cir. 2001).
3
4
Accordingly, the motions must be denied for lack of jurisdiction.
CONCLUSION
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motions (ECF Nos. 82, 90) are DENIED.
6
IT IS SO ORDERED. This 28th day of August, 2018.
7
8
9
_____________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?