Armstrong v. USA

Filing 5

ORDER ( Referencing document numbers in case 3:06-cr-73 : ) The order entered on April 21, 2017 (ECF No. 49 ) is vacated and the court will consider the merits of the petitioner/defendant's motion for voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 48 ) aft er the period for the United States to file any reply to the defendant's response to the motion to reconsider (ECF No. 53 ) has expired and the § 2255 petition (ECF No. 32 ) which is fully briefed. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 4/27/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) (Entered: 04/27/2017)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Respondent/Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) vs. ) ) WILLIAM EDWARD ARMSTRONG, ) ) Petitioner/Defendant. ) _________________________________ ) ) 3:06-cr-00073-HDM-RAM 3:16-cv-00073-HDM ORDER 15 The court improvidently granted the petitioner/defendant’s motion 16 for voluntary dismissal prior to the deadline for the government to 17 file a response to the motion. 18 April 21, 2017 (ECF No. 49) is vacated and the court will consider the 19 merits of the petitioner/defendant’s motion for voluntary dismissal 20 (ECF No. 48) after the period for the United States to file any reply 21 to the defendant’s response to the motion to reconsider (ECF No. 53) 22 has expired and the § 2255 petition (ECF No. 32) which is fully 23 briefed. Accordingly, the order entered on 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: This 27th day of April, 2017. 26 27 ____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?