Fernandez v. Dolezal et al

Filing 37

ORDER that ECF No. 35 Plaintiff's motion for enlargement of time to file replies to ECF Nos. 29 and 30 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's replies due by 2/23/2018; and ECF No. 29 Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file a response to defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 2/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
KEVIN FERNANDEZ,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
GLENN DOLEZAL, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_____________________________ )
PRESENT:

3:16-CV-0076-MMD (VPC)
MINUTES OF THE COURT
February 12, 2018

THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

DEPUTY CLERK:

LISA MANN

REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Plaintiff’s motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 35) to file replies to motions ECF
Nos. 29 & 30 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have to and including Friday, February 23, 2018
to file replies to both motions.
Plaintiff’s motion for enlargement of time to file opposition to defendants’ motion for
summary judgment (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED in part. If the motion for limited discovery is
denied, plaintiff shall have twenty (20) days from the court’s ruling to file an opposition to the
defendants’ motion for summary judgment. If the motion for limited discovery is granted,
plaintiff shall have twenty (20) beyond the discovery deadline date to file an opposition.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
By:

/s/
Deputy Clerk