Fernandez v. Dolezal et al

Filing 37

ORDER that ECF No. 35 Plaintiff's motion for enlargement of time to file replies to ECF Nos. 29 and 30 is GRANTED; Plaintiff's replies due by 2/23/2018; and ECF No. 29 Plaintiff's motion for extension of time to file a response to defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 2/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA KEVIN FERNANDEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) GLENN DOLEZAL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________ ) PRESENT: 3:16-CV-0076-MMD (VPC) MINUTES OF THE COURT February 12, 2018 THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Plaintiff’s motion for enlargement of time (ECF No. 35) to file replies to motions ECF Nos. 29 & 30 is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall have to and including Friday, February 23, 2018 to file replies to both motions. Plaintiff’s motion for enlargement of time to file opposition to defendants’ motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED in part. If the motion for limited discovery is denied, plaintiff shall have twenty (20) days from the court’s ruling to file an opposition to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. If the motion for limited discovery is granted, plaintiff shall have twenty (20) beyond the discovery deadline date to file an opposition. IT IS SO ORDERED. DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?