Bresselsmith v. Stubbs
ORDER denying 25 Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant to Execute and Fulfill Settlement Agreement Contract. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 5/3/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HJ)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
DAVID M. BRESSELSMITH,
C/O STUBBS, JOHN DOE,
MINUTES OF THE COURT
May 3, 2017
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendants to Execute and Fulfill
Settlement Agreement Contract (ECF No. 25). Plaintiff states the case settled on March 8, 2017, in
the amount of $50.00 but claims the money had not been deposited into his Trust 2 account as of
April 7, 2017. In Defendant’s response (ECF No. 26), Defendant states that Plaintiff understood
it could take up to thirty (30) days from the Stipulation and Order of Dismissal was filed to receive
the funds. Defendant represents the funds were deposited into Plaintiff's Trust 2 account on
April 26, 2017. (ECF No. 26, Exh. B.)
The Stipulation for Dismissal was filed on March 15, 2017 (ECF No. 23), and the Order of
Dismissal was filed on April 5, 2017 (ECF No. 24).
Inasmuch as it appears Defendant has complied with the terms of the parties’ settlement
agreement, Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Defendants to Execute and Fulfill Settlement Agreement
Contract (ECF No. 25) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?